From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S933791AbcAKQZD (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 11 Jan 2016 11:25:03 -0500
Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:47863 "EHLO
	mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S933079AbcAKQY7 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 11 Jan 2016 11:24:59 -0500
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:24:48 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= <mans@mansr.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com>,
        "Yang, Wenyou" <Wenyou.Yang@atmel.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <20160111162448.GL6588@sirena.org.uk>
References: <1452528102-26458-1-git-send-email-mans@mansr.com>
 <20160111161333.GK6588@sirena.org.uk>
 <yw1xd1t8w0ps.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rwBPO0Eqq9aLXgcG"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <yw1xd1t8w0ps.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com>
X-Cookie: APL hackers do it in the quad.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:348:6:8808:fab::3
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi: atmel: improve internal vs gpio chip-select
 choice
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


--rwBPO0Eqq9aLXgcG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 04:16:31PM +0000, M=E5ns Rullg=E5rd wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> writes:

> > Normally you shouldn't send incremental patches against patches that
> > have already been applied.

> Should or shouldn't?

Should, sorry.

--rwBPO0Eqq9aLXgcG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWk9dPAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQfGsH/23XNnknbqq+t/C3TgwQVw6n
u24HpJ3vNIgVVfXAmSndbAzlfHTtahl8q1KedoMuC2ABgPvzr27uY2e7v3412w1R
1unL9y/EUFqb47PYsUtiShN0JwegrGQX6tIdMG5xIvzAI3ZiZLCXfR4L3yHvd40J
lKEYxuRgLwMZCAG057NskedzNaKjkUM2b+4vMEzo9/K3TvR/a3lkWQskytdxTb3D
lXEQlr0bousWQptt5AhaHiLe5yCH8YeTDSt5Ua6IA4pYvCE056YqGSfjizLRFaRR
meih6AeeO8AQ+Bp/qlgeTP8fDBLB4YkJesMYupb1oo8Rb2e28Y/n0xYCtiIopBI=
=HMbs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--rwBPO0Eqq9aLXgcG--