From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1757505AbcAMLKp (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 13 Jan 2016 06:10:45 -0500
Received: from mail.karo-electronics.de ([81.173.242.67]:56166 "EHLO
	mail.karo-electronics.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754893AbcAMLKn convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 13 Jan 2016 06:10:43 -0500
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 12:10:12 +0100
From: Lothar =?UTF-8?B?V2HDn21hbm4=?= <LW@KARO-electronics.de>
To: Holger Schurig <holgerschurig@gmail.com>
Cc: Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
        Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
        Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dts: imx6: add support for Ka-Ro electronics
 TX6S-8034 module
Message-ID: <20160113121012.0c924bc8@ipc1.ka-ro>
In-Reply-To: <87h9iigce7.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <1452621710-15336-1-git-send-email-LW@KARO-electronics.de>
	<1452621710-15336-2-git-send-email-LW@KARO-electronics.de>
	<87h9iigce7.fsf@gmail.com>
Organization: Ka-Ro electronics GmbH
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi,

> Lothar Waßmann <LW@KARO-electronics.de> writes:
> 
> > +/ {
> > +	model = "Ka-Ro electronics TX6S-8034 Module";
> > +	compatible = "karo,imx6dl-tx6dl", "fsl,imx6dl";
> > +	timestamp = __DATE__, __TIME__;
> 
> Is this needed or useful?
> 
> There's a movement that aims to do "reproducible builds" ...   being
> able to recompile an image and verify it against the supplied can be
> helpful for security audit purposes.
> 
Ooops. I was on the wrong branch when creating these patches. Will
resend this patch series soon.

> > +	display: display@di0 {
> > +		compatible = "fsl,imx-parallel-display";
> > +		pinctrl-names = "default";
> > +		pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_disp0_1>;
> > +		interface-pix-fmt = "rgb24";
> > +//		fsl,panel = <&lcd0_panel>;
> 
> Probably not for upstream inclusion?
>
see above.