mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86,asm: Re-work smp_store_mb()
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 17:53:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160113165319.GJ12897@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160113184003-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 06:42:48PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Oh, I think this means we need a "cc" clobber.

Btw, does your microbenchmark do it too?

Because, the "cc" clobber should cause additional handling of flags,
depending on the context. It won't matter if the context doesn't need
rFLAGS handling in the benchmark but if we start using LOCK; ADD in the
kernel, I can imagine some places where mb() is used and rFLAGS are
live, causing gcc to either reorder code or stash them away...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-13 16:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-27 19:53 [PATCH -tip 0/4] A few updates around smp_store_mb() Davidlohr Bueso
2015-10-27 19:53 ` [PATCH 1/4] arch,cmpxchg: Remove tas() definitions Davidlohr Bueso
2015-12-04 12:01   ` [tip:locking/core] locking/cmpxchg, arch: " tip-bot for Davidlohr Bueso
2015-10-27 19:53 ` [PATCH 2/4] arch,barrier: Use smp barriers in smp_store_release() Davidlohr Bueso
2015-10-27 20:03   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-12-04 12:01   ` [tip:locking/core] lcoking/barriers, arch: " tip-bot for Davidlohr Bueso
2015-10-27 19:53 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86,asm: Re-work smp_store_mb() Davidlohr Bueso
2015-10-27 21:33   ` Linus Torvalds
2015-10-27 22:01     ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-10-27 22:37     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-28 19:49       ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-11-02 20:15       ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-11-03  0:06         ` Linus Torvalds
2015-11-03  1:36           ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-01-12 13:57           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-01-12 17:20             ` Linus Torvalds
2016-01-12 17:45               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-01-12 18:04                 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-01-12 20:30               ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-01-12 20:54                 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-01-12 20:59                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-01-12 21:37                     ` Linus Torvalds
2016-01-12 22:14                       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-01-13 16:20                       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-01-12 22:21                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-01-12 22:55                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-01-12 23:24                         ` Linus Torvalds
2016-01-13 16:17                           ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-13 16:25                             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-01-13 16:33                               ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-13 16:42                                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-01-13 16:53                                   ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2016-01-13 17:00                                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-01-13 18:38                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2015-10-27 19:53 ` [PATCH 4/4] doc,smp: Remove ambiguous statement in smp_store_mb() Davidlohr Bueso
2015-12-04 12:01   ` [tip:locking/core] locking/barriers, arch: Remove ambiguous statement in the smp_store_mb() documentation tip-bot for Davidlohr Bueso
2015-10-27 23:27 ` [PATCH 1/4] arch,cmpxchg: Remove tas() definitions David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160113165319.GJ12897@pd.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=dbueso@suse.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome