From: Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com>
To: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>, Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: livepatch: reuse module loader code to write relocations
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 22:49:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160114034933.GB980@packer-debian-8-amd64.digitalocean.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1601121729480.15984@pobox.suse.cz>
+++ Miroslav Benes [12/01/16 17:40 +0100]:
>
>Hi Jessica,
>
>I walked through the series and it looks really nice. Others have already
>pointed out the issues I also found, so only few minor things below.
>
>First thing, could you copy&paste the information and reasoning from the
>cover letter to the changelogs where appropriate? It is very detailed and
>it would be a pity to lost it.
Thanks Miroslav! I'll do that.
>On Fri, 8 Jan 2016, Jessica Yu wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/livepatch.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/livepatch.h
>> index 19c099a..7312e25 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/livepatch.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/livepatch.h
>> @@ -33,8 +33,6 @@ static inline int klp_check_compiler_support(void)
>> #endif
>> return 0;
>> }
>> -int klp_write_module_reloc(struct module *mod, unsigned long type,
>> - unsigned long loc, unsigned long value);
>
>You left klp_write_module_reloc() in arch/s390/include/asm/livepatch.h I'm
>afraid. Anyway it would be really great if you managed to test the series
>on s390 somehow. Just to know that all the roadblocks are really gone.
Ah, thanks for catching that. I will also try testing the patchset on
s390x and report back.
>> -/*
>> - * external symbols are located outside the parent object (where the parent
>> - * object is either vmlinux or the kmod being patched).
>> - */
>> -static int klp_find_external_symbol(struct module *pmod, const char *name,
>> - unsigned long *addr)
>> +static int klp_resolve_symbols(Elf_Shdr *relsec, struct module *pmod)
>> {
>> - const struct kernel_symbol *sym;
>> + int i, len, ret = 0;
>> + Elf_Rela *relas;
>> + Elf_Sym *sym;
>> + char *symname, *sym_objname;
>>
>> - /* first, check if it's an exported symbol */
>> - preempt_disable();
>> - sym = find_symbol(name, NULL, NULL, true, true);
>> - if (sym) {
>> - *addr = sym->value;
>> - preempt_enable();
>> - return 0;
>> + relas = (Elf_Rela *) relsec->sh_addr;
>> + /* For each rela in this .klp.rel. section */
>> + for (i = 0; i < relsec->sh_size / sizeof(Elf_Rela); i++) {
>> + sym = pmod->core_symtab + ELF_R_SYM(relas[i].r_info);
>> + symname = pmod->core_strtab + sym->st_name;
>
>Maybe it would be better to use pmod->symtab and pmod->strtab everywhere.
>It should be the same, but core_* versions are only helpers used in
>load_module and friends. There is even a comment in
>include/linux/module.h.
>
> /*
> * We keep the symbol and string tables for kallsyms.
> * The core_* fields below are temporary, loader-only (they
> * could really be discarded after module init).
> */
>
>We should respect that.
I admit I'm a bit confused by the comment, I can't seem to find where
core_symtab and core_strtab are purportedly discarded after module
init (perhaps I'm missing something?). IMO it sounds more like it's
describing mod->symtab and mod->strtab instead, because these are in
module init memory and are freed later. In any case, my reason for using
core_symtab is that the original symbol table (mod->symtab) is marked
with INIT_OFFSET_MASK in layout_symtab() (see kernel/module.c), and is
therefore in init memory. This memory is freed near the end of
do_init_module() with do_free_init(). Since core_symtab is in module core
memory, for livepatch modules I simply used core_symtab to hold a
full copy of the symbol table instead of the slimmed down version that
it was originally intended to hold.
Alternatively, we can tweak layout_symtab() to *not* mark the symtab
with INIT_OFFSET_MASK and put it in core memory instead. I think
either way will work, but maybe it is cleaner to do it this way
instead.
Jessica
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-14 3:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-08 19:28 [RFC PATCH v3 0/6] (mostly) Arch-independent livepatch Jessica Yu
2016-01-08 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/6] Elf: add livepatch-specific Elf constants Jessica Yu
2016-01-08 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/6] module: preserve Elf information for livepatch modules Jessica Yu
2016-01-11 1:25 ` Rusty Russell
2016-01-14 4:47 ` Jessica Yu
2016-01-14 20:28 ` Rusty Russell
2016-01-08 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/6] module: s390: keep mod_arch_specific " Jessica Yu
2016-01-08 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/6] livepatch: reuse module loader code to write relocations Jessica Yu
2016-01-11 16:56 ` Petr Mladek
2016-01-11 20:53 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-01-11 21:33 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-01-11 22:35 ` Jessica Yu
2016-01-12 3:05 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-01-12 9:12 ` Petr Mladek
2016-01-14 5:07 ` Jessica Yu
2016-01-12 16:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/6] " Miroslav Benes
2016-01-14 3:49 ` Jessica Yu [this message]
2016-01-14 9:04 ` Miroslav Benes
2016-01-13 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/6] " Miroslav Benes
2016-01-13 9:31 ` Jiri Kosina
2016-01-13 18:39 ` Jessica Yu
2016-01-14 9:10 ` Miroslav Benes
2016-01-08 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 5/6] samples: livepatch: mark as livepatch module Jessica Yu
2016-01-08 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 6/6] Documentation: livepatch: outline the Elf format of a " Jessica Yu
2016-01-12 12:09 ` Petr Mladek
2016-01-12 14:45 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-01-14 5:04 ` Jessica Yu
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-03-16 19:47 [PATCH v5 0/6] (mostly) Arch-independent livepatch Jessica Yu
2016-03-16 19:47 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] livepatch: reuse module loader code to write relocations Jessica Yu
2016-03-21 13:55 ` Miroslav Benes
2016-03-21 19:18 ` Jessica Yu
2016-03-21 19:24 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-03-21 21:16 ` Jiri Kosina
2016-03-21 21:34 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-03-21 22:02 ` Jiri Kosina
2016-03-22 19:00 ` Jessica Yu
2016-03-21 16:31 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] " Petr Mladek
2016-03-21 16:46 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-03-21 17:36 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-03-21 18:07 ` Jessica Yu
2016-02-04 1:11 [RFC PATCH v4 0/6] (mostly) Arch-independent livepatch Jessica Yu
2016-02-04 1:11 ` [RFC PATCH v4 4/6] livepatch: reuse module loader code to write relocations Jessica Yu
2016-02-08 20:26 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-02-10 0:56 ` Jessica Yu
2016-02-09 14:01 ` [RFC PATCH v4 4/6] " Petr Mladek
2016-02-10 1:21 ` Jessica Yu
2015-12-01 4:21 [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] (mostly) Arch-independent livepatch Jessica Yu
2015-12-01 4:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/6] livepatch: reuse module loader code to write relocations Jessica Yu
2015-12-01 8:43 ` Jessica Yu
2015-12-08 18:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/6] " Josh Poimboeuf
2015-12-09 19:10 ` Jessica Yu
2015-12-10 14:28 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-12-10 21:33 ` Jessica Yu
2015-12-10 21:41 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-12-10 22:07 ` Jessica Yu
2015-12-16 5:40 ` Jessica Yu
2015-12-16 12:59 ` Miroslav Benes
2015-12-16 19:14 ` Jessica Yu
2015-12-17 15:45 ` Petr Mladek
2015-12-21 5:57 ` Jessica Yu
2015-11-10 4:45 [RFC PATCH 0/5] Arch-independent livepatch Jessica Yu
2015-11-10 4:45 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] livepatch: reuse module loader code to write relocations Jessica Yu
2015-11-11 14:30 ` Miroslav Benes
2015-11-11 20:07 ` Jessica Yu
2015-11-12 15:27 ` Miroslav Benes
2015-11-12 17:40 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-11-12 20:22 ` Jessica Yu
2015-11-12 20:32 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-11-13 7:15 ` Jessica Yu
2015-11-13 13:51 ` Miroslav Benes
2015-11-12 19:14 ` Jessica Yu
2015-11-12 20:35 ` Jessica Yu
2015-11-11 15:22 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] " Petr Mladek
2015-11-11 18:27 ` Jessica Yu
2015-11-12 9:16 ` Petr Mladek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160114034933.GB980@packer-debian-8-amd64.digitalocean.com \
--to=jeyu@redhat.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=sjenning@redhat.com \
--cc=vojtech@suse.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®