From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753213AbcANJ5T (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2016 04:57:19 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39677 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753168AbcANJ5R (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2016 04:57:17 -0500 Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:57:13 +0100 From: Jiri Olsa To: Wang Nan Cc: acme@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pi3orama@163.com, lizefan@huawei.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] perf build: Test correct path of perf in build-test Message-ID: <20160114095713.GB31454@krava.brq.redhat.com> References: <1452687442-6186-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com> <1452687442-6186-4-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1452687442-6186-4-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:17:16PM +0000, Wang Nan wrote: SNIP > +test_make_python_perf_so := test -f $(PERF_OUT)/python/perf.so > > -test_make_perf_o := test -f $(PERF)/perf.o > -test_make_util_map_o := test -f $(PERF)/util/map.o > -test_make_util_pmu_bison_o := test -f $(PERF)/util/pmu-bison.o > +test_make_perf_o := test -f $(PERF_OUT)/perf.o > +test_make_util_map_o := test -f $(PERF_OUT)/util/map.o > +test_make_util_pmu_bison_o := test -f $(PERF_OUT)/util/pmu-bison.o > > define test_dest_files > for file in $(1); do \ > @@ -244,7 +246,7 @@ test_make_perf_o_O := test -f $$TMP_O/perf.o > test_make_util_map_o_O := test -f $$TMP_O/util/map.o > test_make_util_pmu_bison_o_O := test -f $$TMP_O/util/pmu-bison.o > > -test_default = test -x $(PERF)/perf > +test_default = test -x $(PERF_OUT)/perf > test = $(if $(test_$1),$(test_$1),$(test_default)) > > test_default_O = test -x $$TMP_O/perf > @@ -264,7 +266,7 @@ endif > > MAKEFLAGS := --no-print-directory > > -clean := @(cd $(PERF); make -s -f $(MK) clean >/dev/null) > +clean := @(cd $(PERF); make -s -f $(MK) O=$(PERF_OUT) clean >/dev/null; make -s -f $(MK) clean >/dev/null) what's the second make clean for? thanks, jirka