From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: perf stat stddev reporting broken since "perf stat: Introduce read_counters function"
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 10:57:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160119095720.GA3917@krava.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160119093812.GD10802@techsingularity.net>
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 09:38:12AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 09:16:23AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 08:42:28AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >
> > SNIP
> >
> > > >
> > > > Performance counter stats for 'sleep 1' (5 runs):
> > > >
> > > > 0.583178 task-clock (msec) # 0.001 CPUs utilized
> > > > 1 context-switches # 0.002 M/sec
> > > > 0 cpu-migrations # 0.000 K/sec
> > > > 67 page-faults # 0.141 M/sec
> > > > 1,224,416 cycles # 2.585 GHz
> > > > <not supported> stalled-cycles-frontend
> > > > <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend
> > > > 892,568 instructions # 0.68 insns per cycle
> > > > 184,975 branches # 390.554 M/sec
> > > > 8,512 branch-misses # 4.57% of all branches
> > > >
> > > > 1.000889249 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.01% )
> > > >
> > > > I checked and current master in Linus' tree is also broken. Is this
> > > > change in documented perf stat behaviour intentional?
> > >
> > > nope, not intentional.. I'll check on that, thanks for reporting
> >
> > for some reason we initialized the stat every iteration,
> > (the call is also wrong because it's called only over the
> > first res_stats[0])
> >
> > attached patch works for me, could you please test?
> > I'll run more tests and put it in my queue
> >
>
> That works for me too, thanks. Feel free to put this on the patch;
>
> Tested-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
>
> When you send it through, can you make sure it has the following please?
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.2+
will do, thanks
jirka
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-19 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-18 17:59 Mel Gorman
2016-01-19 7:42 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-01-19 8:16 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-01-19 9:38 ` Mel Gorman
2016-01-19 9:57 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160119095720.GA3917@krava.brq.redhat.com \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome