From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752475AbcAUAaw (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2016 19:30:52 -0500 Received: from down.free-electrons.com ([37.187.137.238]:47991 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751430AbcAUAat (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2016 19:30:49 -0500 Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 01:30:47 +0100 From: Alexandre Belloni To: Javier Martinez Canillas Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kukjin Kim , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, Chanwoo Choi , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Laxman Dewangan , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] rtc: max77686: Extend driver and add max77802 support Message-ID: <20160121003047.GF3367@piout.net> References: <1453310088-29985-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1453310088-29985-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 20/01/2016 at 14:14:40 -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote : > One thing that I'm not sure is how to handle bisectability, in patch #5 > there will be two drivers that matches "rtc-max77802". So I don't know > if I should use a different platform_device_id name and change in the > same patch that max77802 is removed or if this is not a big deal so the > patches could stay as is. > I'm fine with those patches as is. > I believe all patches should go through the RTC tree with proper acks or > wait until the RTC patches land to pick the defconfig changes. > I think Olof would prefer the last patches to go through arm-soc. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com