From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753539AbcAVPWj (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 22 Jan 2016 10:22:39 -0500
Received: from mail-qg0-f68.google.com ([209.85.192.68]:33529 "EHLO
	mail-qg0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751091AbcAVPWe (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 22 Jan 2016 10:22:34 -0500
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 10:22:32 -0500
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
        KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        cgroups@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH cgroup/for-4.5-fixes] cpuset: make mm migration
 asynchronous
Message-ID: <20160122152232.GB32380@htj.duckdns.org>
References: <56978452.6010606@de.ibm.com>
 <20160114195630.GA3520@mtj.duckdns.org>
 <5698A023.9070703@de.ibm.com>
 <20160115164023.GH3520@mtj.duckdns.org>
 <20160119171841.GP3520@mtj.duckdns.org>
 <56A23BA8.1040403@de.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <56A23BA8.1040403@de.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hello, Christian.

On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 03:24:40PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Hmmm I just realized that this patch slightly differs from the one that
> I tested. Do we need a retest?

It should be fine but I'd appreciate if you can test it again.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun