From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754005AbcAVPrc (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jan 2016 10:47:32 -0500 Received: from mail-qg0-f66.google.com ([209.85.192.66]:36679 "EHLO mail-qg0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752819AbcAVPr2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jan 2016 10:47:28 -0500 Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 10:47:25 -0500 From: Tejun Heo To: Christian Borntraeger Cc: Li Zefan , Johannes Weiner , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-s390 , KVM list , Oleg Nesterov , Peter Zijlstra , "Paul E. McKenney" , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com Subject: Re: [PATCH cgroup/for-4.5-fixes] cpuset: make mm migration asynchronous Message-ID: <20160122154725.GF32380@htj.duckdns.org> References: <56978452.6010606@de.ibm.com> <20160114195630.GA3520@mtj.duckdns.org> <5698A023.9070703@de.ibm.com> <20160115164023.GH3520@mtj.duckdns.org> <20160119171841.GP3520@mtj.duckdns.org> <56A23BA8.1040403@de.ibm.com> <20160122152232.GB32380@htj.duckdns.org> <56A24EAD.1010507@de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56A24EAD.1010507@de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 04:45:49PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > On 01/22/2016 04:22 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Hello, Christian. > > > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 03:24:40PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > >> Hmmm I just realized that this patch slightly differs from the one that > >> I tested. Do we need a retest? > > > > It should be fine but I'd appreciate if you can test it again. > > I did restart the test after I wrote the mail. The latest version from this mail > thread is still fine as far as I can tell. Thanks a lot. Much appreciated. -- tejun