From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
To: kernel test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: LKP <lkp@01.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
wfg@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [perf/x86] 75925e1ad7: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 000045b8
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 17:27:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160123012738.GA28154@tassilo.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56a1b114.H5JOWAoJgA2/uN2W%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 12:33:24PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> 0day kernel testing robot got the below dmesg and the first bad commit is
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
Thanks. I managed to break 32bit kernels. The appended patch should
fix it.
----
x86, perf: Fix perf user stack trace walking
Fix 75925e1ad7 (perf/x86: Optimize stack walk user accesses)
Replace the hard coded 64bit frame pointer sizes, with sizeof depending
on the size of unsigned long on the host.
This avoids a stack smash on 32bit kernels, which was dutifully reported
by the 0day kbuild robot.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index 1b443db..ea4eb5c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -2328,13 +2328,16 @@ perf_callchain_user(struct perf_callchain_entry *entry, struct pt_regs *regs)
frame.next_frame = NULL;
frame.return_address = 0;
- if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, fp, 16))
+ if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, fp, sizeof(frame)))
break;
- bytes = __copy_from_user_nmi(&frame.next_frame, fp, 8);
+ bytes = __copy_from_user_nmi(&frame.next_frame, fp,
+ sizeof(frame.next_frame));
if (bytes != 0)
break;
- bytes = __copy_from_user_nmi(&frame.return_address, fp+8, 8);
+ bytes = __copy_from_user_nmi(&frame.return_address,
+ fp + sizeof(frame.next_frame),
+ sizeof(frame.return_address));
if (bytes != 0)
break;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-23 1:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-22 4:33 kernel test robot
2016-01-22 7:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-23 1:27 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160123012738.GA28154@tassilo.jf.intel.com \
--to=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@01.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=wfg@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome