From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932469AbcAYMYf (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2016 07:24:35 -0500 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:45951 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932350AbcAYMY1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2016 07:24:27 -0500 Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 12:23:47 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= Cc: Viresh Kumar , Andy Shevchenko , Vinod Koul , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Haavard Skinnemoen , Hans-Christian Egtvedt , Tejun Heo , Dan Williams , Daniel Mack , Haojian Zhuang , Robert Jarzmik , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20160125122347.GM6588@sirena.org.uk> References: <1453663322-14474-1-git-send-email-mans@mansr.com> <1453663322-14474-4-git-send-email-mans@mansr.com> <20160124223629.GI6588@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="e9BJxh3jTFf/APYk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: APL hackers do it in the quad. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:348:6:8808:fab::3 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] dmaengine: dw: rename masters to reflect actual topology X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --e9BJxh3jTFf/APYk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 10:38:57PM +0000, M=E5ns Rullg=E5rd wrote: > Mark Brown writes: > > This is patch 3 of a series but I don't have anything else in the > > series. What is going on with the rest of the series - what are the > > dependencies and so on? > I give up. Seriously, this is impossible. If I don't include everybody > in the slightest way related to any patch in the series, I get > complaints that patches are missing. If I do, the lists reject it all > due to too many recipients. What the hell am I supposed to do? You should normally include at least the subsystem maintainers in at least the cover letter and cover the dependencies there. Think about how this is going to work: if you don't give us any information on what's going on with dependencies then we can't tell how to handle the patches - do we need to apply them, only review them or what? --e9BJxh3jTFf/APYk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWphPTAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQvIsH/18K67Vz/iG1dCd7ZJk1hjqq xKXkc56SvttMqO9uo72pUp+PN6u+mCP11g1FVm85HDe23wmJO8XAwfB8bzkwsDLv kxGWqrd+PLiiu9CE5YASx1I84mzjimE29A4nR6A0/tIgGa09RKQioXB9eUeen39B HZIa8IjeK7I7+CZNfWeqiwTQAdeGsfk/dCzSdBit2Yx+6tvHhOItwP+dlgKcIKIH ongI/E2X15SipfHED7PQ7nEcs2M+sGaVMmLMveKGV3lC2t3ajcqSZIt1vo1MrNvO TVnil39laB9fKmftvh0AeN1vwsF6ybEPmT14V2kX15rsVNpsumiiBC6cUGU5raw= =kyi6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --e9BJxh3jTFf/APYk--