From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966138AbcAZObS (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2016 09:31:18 -0500 Received: from pandora.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:37056 "EHLO pandora.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965937AbcAZObO (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2016 09:31:14 -0500 Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 14:31:02 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: mika.penttila@nextfour.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 v2] set_memory_xx fixes Message-ID: <20160126143102.GP10826@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1453789989-13260-1-git-send-email-mika.penttila@nextfour.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1453789989-13260-1-git-send-email-mika.penttila@nextfour.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 08:33:07AM +0200, mika.penttila@nextfour.com wrote: > Recent changes (4.4.0+) in module loader triggered oops on ARM. > > The module in question is in-tree module : > drivers/misc/ti-st/st_drv.ko I don't see a reason for these to be applied together, they each look like stand-alone changes. I'd like to apply the ARM (32-bit) change, but as it incorporates ARM64 changes, I either need an ack from ARM64 people, or I need the ARM64 code split out. Please re-send, copying the ARM64 maintainers too, optionally splitting the first patch up. Thanks. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.