mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: "Huang Rui" <ray.huang@amd.com>, "Borislav Petkov" <bp@suse.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@amacapital.net>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Robert Richter" <rric@kernel.org>,
	"Jacob Shin" <jacob.w.shin@gmail.com>,
	"John Stultz" <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	"Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, spg_linux_kernel@amd.com,
	x86@kernel.org, "Guenter Roeck" <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	"Andreas Herrmann" <herrmann.der.user@googlemail.com>,
	"Suravee Suthikulpanit" <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
	"Aravind Gopalakrishnan" <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>,
	"Fengguang Wu" <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	"Aaron Lu" <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] perf/x86/amd/power: Add AMD accumulated power reporting mechanism
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 16:28:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160128152848.GT6356@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160128090314.GB14274@pd.tnic>

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:03:15AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:

> +
> +struct power_pmu {
> +	raw_spinlock_t		lock;

Now that the list is gone, what does this thing protect?

> +	struct pmu		*pmu;

This member seems superfluous, there's only the one possible value.

> +	local64_t		cpu_sw_pwr_ptsc;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * These two cpumasks are used for avoiding the allocations on the
> +	 * CPU_STARTING phase because power_cpu_prepare() will be called with
> +	 * IRQs disabled.
> +	 */
> +	cpumask_var_t		mask;
> +	cpumask_var_t		tmp_mask;
> +};
> +
> +static struct pmu pmu_class;
> +
> +/*
> + * Accumulated power represents the sum of each compute unit's (CU) power
> + * consumption. On any core of each CU we read the total accumulated power from
> + * MSR_F15H_CU_PWR_ACCUMULATOR. cpu_mask represents CPU bit map of all cores
> + * which are picked to measure the power for the CUs they belong to.
> + */
> +static cpumask_t cpu_mask;
> +
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct power_pmu *, amd_power_pmu);
> +
> +static u64 event_update(struct perf_event *event, struct power_pmu *pmu)
> +{

Is there ever a case where @pmu != __this_cpu_read(power_pmu) ?

> +	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> +	u64 prev_raw_count, new_raw_count, prev_ptsc, new_ptsc;
> +	u64 delta, tdelta;
> +
> +again:
> +	prev_raw_count = local64_read(&hwc->prev_count);
> +	prev_ptsc = local64_read(&pmu->cpu_sw_pwr_ptsc);
> +	rdmsrl(event->hw.event_base, new_raw_count);

Is hw.event_base != MSR_F15H_CU_PWR_ACCUMULATOR possible?

> +	rdmsrl(MSR_F15H_PTSC, new_ptsc);


Also, I suspect this doesn't do what you expect it to do.

We measure per-event PWR_ACC deltas, but per CPU PTSC values. These do
not match when there's more than 1 event on the CPU.

I would suggest adding a new struct to the hw_perf_event union with the
two u64 deltas like:

	struct { /* amd_power */
		u64 pwr_acc;
		u64 ptsc;
	};

And track these values per-event.

> +
> +	if (local64_cmpxchg(&hwc->prev_count, prev_raw_count,
> +			    new_raw_count) != prev_raw_count) {
> +		cpu_relax();
> +		goto again;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Calculate the CU power consumption over a time period, the unit of
> +	 * final value (delta) is micro-Watts. Then add it to the event count.
> +	 */
> +	if (new_raw_count < prev_raw_count) {
> +		delta = max_cu_acc_power + new_raw_count;
> +		delta -= prev_raw_count;
> +	} else
> +		delta = new_raw_count - prev_raw_count;
> +
> +	delta *= cpu_pwr_sample_ratio * 1000;
> +	tdelta = new_ptsc - prev_ptsc;
> +
> +	do_div(delta, tdelta);
> +	local64_add(delta, &event->count);

Then this division can be redone on the total values, that looses less
precision over-all.

> +
> +	return new_raw_count;
> +}

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-01-28 15:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-28  6:38 Huang Rui
2016-01-28  9:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-28  9:39   ` [PATCH] perf/x86/amd/power: Add AMD accumulated power reporting kbuild test robot
2016-01-28  9:41   ` kbuild test robot
2016-01-28 10:01   ` [PATCH v4] perf/x86/amd/power: Add AMD accumulated power reporting mechanism Huang Rui
2016-01-28 12:42     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-28 14:54       ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-28 10:04   ` [PATCH] perf/x86/amd/power: Add AMD accumulated power reporting kbuild test robot
2016-01-28 15:28   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-01-29  8:18     ` [PATCH v4] perf/x86/amd/power: Add AMD accumulated power reporting mechanism Huang Rui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160128152848.GT6356@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com \
    --cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=herrmann.der.user@googlemail.com \
    --cc=jacob.w.shin@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
    --cc=rric@kernel.org \
    --cc=spg_linux_kernel@amd.com \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome