From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756456AbcA3Api (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jan 2016 19:45:38 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:37126 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754030AbcA3Apg (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jan 2016 19:45:36 -0500 Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 16:45:34 -0800 From: Stephen Boyd To: Masahiro Yamada Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Michael Turquette , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: optimize the divider walk in clk_divider_bestdiv() Message-ID: <20160130004533.GP12841@codeaurora.org> References: <1451965421-28227-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1451965421-28227-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/05, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Because _next_div() returns a valid divider, there is no need to > consult _is_valid_div() for the validity of the divider in every > iteration. > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada > --- Applied to clk-next -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project