From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754126AbcBAWlk (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Feb 2016 17:41:40 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:56419 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753644AbcBAWli (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Feb 2016 17:41:38 -0500 Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 23:41:30 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Steven Rostedt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Juri Lelli , Clark Williams , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] sched: Add debugfs/sched/deadline_bw file to show current bandwidths Message-ID: <20160201224130.GB6357@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20160201202624.079532484@goodmis.org> <20160201202742.317361821@goodmis.org> <20160201221720.GZ6357@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20160201173809.3df5c1f3@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160201173809.3df5c1f3@gandalf.local.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 05:38:09PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > Regardless of this final patch, what do you think of the first three? I > can send them as a separate series, just to get more of the SCHED_DEBUG > code into debug.c. The first two looked ok, the third I had a vague niggle it might be part of something bigger and tearing it up like this might make it harder. Other than that, I didn't really look at them for more than a few seconds. I'll give them more of a look tomorrow.