mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>, Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.com>,
	Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] livepatch/module: remove livepatch module notifier
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 15:30:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160208143024.GE30328@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454728097-7106-3-git-send-email-jeyu@redhat.com>

On Fri 2016-02-05 22:08:17, Jessica Yu wrote:
> Remove the livepatch module notifier in favor of directly enabling and
> disabling patches to modules in the module loader. Hard-coding the
> function calls ensures that ftrace_module_enable() is run before
> klp_module_coming() during module load, and that klp_module_going() is
> run before ftrace_release_mod() during module unload. This way, ftrace
> and livepatch code is run in the correct order during the module
> load/unload sequence without dependence on the module notifier call chain.
> 
> This fixes a notifier ordering issue in which the ftrace module notifier
> (and hence ftrace_module_enable()) for coming modules was being called
> after klp_module_notify(), which caused livepatch modules to initialize
> incorrectly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/livepatch.h |   9 +++
>  kernel/livepatch/core.c   | 153 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  kernel/module.c           |  20 +++++-
>  3 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/livepatch.h b/include/linux/livepatch.h
> index a882865..bd830d5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/livepatch.h
> +++ b/include/linux/livepatch.h
> @@ -134,6 +134,15 @@ int klp_unregister_patch(struct klp_patch *);
>  int klp_enable_patch(struct klp_patch *);
>  int klp_disable_patch(struct klp_patch *);
>  
> +/* Called from the module loader during module coming/going states */
> +int klp_module_coming(struct module *mod);
> +void klp_module_going(struct module *mod);
> +
> +#else /* !CONFIG_LIVEPATCH */
> +
> +static inline int klp_module_coming(struct module *mod) { return 0; }
> +static inline void klp_module_going(struct module *mod) { }
> +
>  #endif /* CONFIG_LIVEPATCH */
>  
>  #endif /* _LINUX_LIVEPATCH_H_ */
> diff --git a/kernel/livepatch/core.c b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> index bc2c85c..1d47f96 100644
> --- a/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> +int klp_module_coming(struct module *mod)
[...]
> +			obj->mod = mod;
[...]
> +			ret = klp_init_object_loaded(patch, obj);
> +			if (ret) {
> +				pr_warn("failed to initialize patch '%s' for module '%s' (%d)\n",
> +					patch->mod->name, obj->mod->name, ret);
> +				goto err;
> +			}
[...]
> +			ret = klp_enable_object(obj);
> +			if (ret) {
> +				pr_warn("failed to apply patch '%s' to module '%s' (%d)\n",
> +					patch->mod->name, obj->mod->name, ret);
> +				goto err;
> +			}
[...]
> +
> +err:
> +	/*
> +	 * If a patch is unsuccessfully applied, return
> +	 * error to the module loader.
> +	 */
> +	pr_warn("patch '%s' failed for module '%s', refusing to load module '%s'\n",
> +		patch->mod->name, obj->mod->name, obj->mod->name);
> +	obj->mod = NULL;

To be on the safe side, we should replace this assignment with:

	klp_free_object_loaded(mod);

It clears obj->mod and also all func->old_addr for this module.
By other words, it leaves the structures in the same state as
klp_module_going(). I am sorry that I have missed this before.

Otherwise, it looks fine. So, with the above suggested change:

Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>

Best Regards,
Petr

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-08 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-06  3:08 [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix ordering of ftrace/livepatch calls on module load and unload Jessica Yu
2016-02-06  3:08 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ftrace/module: remove ftrace module notifier Jessica Yu
2016-02-08 14:18   ` Petr Mladek
2016-02-08 17:31   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-02-06  3:08 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] livepatch/module: remove livepatch " Jessica Yu
2016-02-08 14:30   ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2016-02-08 17:48 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix ordering of ftrace/livepatch calls on module load and unload Josh Poimboeuf
2016-02-08 17:58   ` Jessica Yu
2016-02-08 18:00     ` Jiri Kosina
2016-03-17  0:55 [PATCH v3 0/2] Livepatch module notifier cleanup Jessica Yu
2016-03-17  0:55 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] livepatch/module: remove livepatch module notifier Jessica Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160208143024.GE30328@pathway.suse.cz \
    --to=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=jeyu@redhat.com \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=sjenning@redhat.com \
    --cc=vojtech@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®