From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>, Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.com>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] livepatch/module: remove livepatch module notifier
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 15:30:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160208143024.GE30328@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454728097-7106-3-git-send-email-jeyu@redhat.com>
On Fri 2016-02-05 22:08:17, Jessica Yu wrote:
> Remove the livepatch module notifier in favor of directly enabling and
> disabling patches to modules in the module loader. Hard-coding the
> function calls ensures that ftrace_module_enable() is run before
> klp_module_coming() during module load, and that klp_module_going() is
> run before ftrace_release_mod() during module unload. This way, ftrace
> and livepatch code is run in the correct order during the module
> load/unload sequence without dependence on the module notifier call chain.
>
> This fixes a notifier ordering issue in which the ftrace module notifier
> (and hence ftrace_module_enable()) for coming modules was being called
> after klp_module_notify(), which caused livepatch modules to initialize
> incorrectly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com>
> ---
> include/linux/livepatch.h | 9 +++
> kernel/livepatch/core.c | 153 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> kernel/module.c | 20 +++++-
> 3 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/livepatch.h b/include/linux/livepatch.h
> index a882865..bd830d5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/livepatch.h
> +++ b/include/linux/livepatch.h
> @@ -134,6 +134,15 @@ int klp_unregister_patch(struct klp_patch *);
> int klp_enable_patch(struct klp_patch *);
> int klp_disable_patch(struct klp_patch *);
>
> +/* Called from the module loader during module coming/going states */
> +int klp_module_coming(struct module *mod);
> +void klp_module_going(struct module *mod);
> +
> +#else /* !CONFIG_LIVEPATCH */
> +
> +static inline int klp_module_coming(struct module *mod) { return 0; }
> +static inline void klp_module_going(struct module *mod) { }
> +
> #endif /* CONFIG_LIVEPATCH */
>
> #endif /* _LINUX_LIVEPATCH_H_ */
> diff --git a/kernel/livepatch/core.c b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> index bc2c85c..1d47f96 100644
> --- a/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> +int klp_module_coming(struct module *mod)
[...]
> + obj->mod = mod;
[...]
> + ret = klp_init_object_loaded(patch, obj);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_warn("failed to initialize patch '%s' for module '%s' (%d)\n",
> + patch->mod->name, obj->mod->name, ret);
> + goto err;
> + }
[...]
> + ret = klp_enable_object(obj);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_warn("failed to apply patch '%s' to module '%s' (%d)\n",
> + patch->mod->name, obj->mod->name, ret);
> + goto err;
> + }
[...]
> +
> +err:
> + /*
> + * If a patch is unsuccessfully applied, return
> + * error to the module loader.
> + */
> + pr_warn("patch '%s' failed for module '%s', refusing to load module '%s'\n",
> + patch->mod->name, obj->mod->name, obj->mod->name);
> + obj->mod = NULL;
To be on the safe side, we should replace this assignment with:
klp_free_object_loaded(mod);
It clears obj->mod and also all func->old_addr for this module.
By other words, it leaves the structures in the same state as
klp_module_going(). I am sorry that I have missed this before.
Otherwise, it looks fine. So, with the above suggested change:
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Best Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-08 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-06 3:08 [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix ordering of ftrace/livepatch calls on module load and unload Jessica Yu
2016-02-06 3:08 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ftrace/module: remove ftrace module notifier Jessica Yu
2016-02-08 14:18 ` Petr Mladek
2016-02-08 17:31 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-02-06 3:08 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] livepatch/module: remove livepatch " Jessica Yu
2016-02-08 14:30 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2016-02-08 17:48 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix ordering of ftrace/livepatch calls on module load and unload Josh Poimboeuf
2016-02-08 17:58 ` Jessica Yu
2016-02-08 18:00 ` Jiri Kosina
2016-03-17 0:55 [PATCH v3 0/2] Livepatch module notifier cleanup Jessica Yu
2016-03-17 0:55 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] livepatch/module: remove livepatch module notifier Jessica Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160208143024.GE30328@pathway.suse.cz \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=jeyu@redhat.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=sjenning@redhat.com \
--cc=vojtech@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®