From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752502AbcBJP5a (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Feb 2016 10:57:30 -0500 Received: from mail-yw0-f176.google.com ([209.85.161.176]:32923 "EHLO mail-yw0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751815AbcBJP52 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Feb 2016 10:57:28 -0500 Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 10:57:27 -0500 From: Tejun Heo To: Jiri Slaby Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com, mhocko@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, pmladek@suse.com, jack@suse.cz, ben@decadent.org.uk, sasha.levin@oracle.com, shli@fb.com, daniel.bilik@neosystem.cz, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] workqueue: break local execution guarantee of unbound work items Message-ID: <20160210155727.GF3741@mtj.duckdns.org> References: <1455059690-18765-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <56BAEE62.5030000@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56BAEE62.5030000@suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, Jiri. On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 09:01:38AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: > Thanks all for sorting the issue out. Now it remains to decide what > should go to stable. Given only 0001 is marked as "Fixes", is that enough? I think so. The other two are primarily for debugging anyway. > And what about the vmstat fix: > commit 176bed1de5bf977938cad26551969eca8f0883b1 > Author: Linus Torvalds > Date: Thu Oct 15 13:01:50 2015 -0700 > > vmstat: explicitly schedule per-cpu work on the CPU we need it to run on > > ? It should fix better than what 0001 is reverting AFAIU, right? Yes, definitely. Didn't know that one wasn't tagged for stable. Thanks. -- tejun