From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752012AbcBKAu6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Feb 2016 19:50:58 -0500 Received: from mail-lb0-f181.google.com ([209.85.217.181]:36297 "EHLO mail-lb0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750771AbcBKAuz (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Feb 2016 19:50:55 -0500 From: "Niklas =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F6derlund?=" X-Google-Original-From: Niklas =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F6derlund?= Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 01:50:52 +0100 To: Simon Horman Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, geert+renesas@glider.be, vinod.koul@intel.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, robin.murphy@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/8] ARM: dts: r8a7790: add iommus to dmac0 and dmac1 Message-ID: <20160211005052.GD19813@bigcity.dyn.berto.se> Mail-Followup-To: Simon Horman , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, geert+renesas@glider.be, vinod.koul@intel.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, robin.murphy@arm.com References: <1455065878-11906-1-git-send-email-niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se> <1455065878-11906-8-git-send-email-niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se> <20160210175559.GD17671@verge.net.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160210175559.GD17671@verge.net.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Simon, * Simon Horman [2016-02-10 18:55:59 +0100]: > Hi Niklas, > > I am deferring accepting this and the similar patch for the r8a7791 pending > acceptance of the driver changes earlier in this series. Please let me know > if you prefer a different course of action. That sounds good, thanks. > > I notice that the devel branch of there renesas tree there are > dmac nodes for the r8a7793, r8a7794 and r8a7795. Is this change, > also suitable for those SoCs? If so, do you plan to update them? > If not I'll add it to my todo list. I planed to update all effected SoCs once the dependencies for this series where accepted. But if you want to keep track of this I'm happy.