mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>, Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 20:49:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160211194943.GH5565@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40665bc51802a9976345f2a41dc6abb97dd944a5.1453754484.git.luto@kernel.org>

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 01:34:14PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> This is a second attempt to make the improvements from c6f2062935c8
> ("x86/signal/64: Fix SS handling for signals delivered to 64-bit
> programs"), which was reverted by 51adbfbba5c6 ("x86/signal/64: Add
> support for SS in the 64-bit signal context").
> 
> This adds two new uc_flags flags.  UC_SIGCONTEXT_SS will be set for
> all 64-bit signals (including x32).  It indicates that the saved SS
> field is valid and that the kernel supports the new behavior.
> 
> The goal is to fix a problems with signal handling in 64-bit tasks:
> SS wasn't saved in the 64-bit signal context, making it awkward to
> determine what SS was at the time of signal delivery and making it
> impossible to return to a non-flat SS (as calling sigreturn clobbers
> SS).
> 
> This also made it extremely difficult for 64-bit tasks to return to
> fully-defined 16-bit contexts, because only the kernel can easily do
> espfix64, but sigreturn was unable to set a non-flag SS:ESP.
> (DOSEMU has a monstrous hack to partially work around this
> limitation.)
> 
> If we could go back in time, the correct fix would be to make 64-bit
> signals work just like 32-bit signals with respect to SS: save it
> in signal context, reset it when delivering a signal, and restore
> it in sigreturn.
> 
> Unfortunately, doing that (as I tried originally) breaks DOSEMU:
> DOSEMU wouldn't reset the signal context's SS when clearing the LDT
> and changing the saved CS to 64-bit mode, since it predates the SS
> context field existing in the first place.
> 
> This patch is a bit more complicated, and it tries to balance a
> bunch of goals.  It makes most cases of changing ucontext->ss during
> signal handling work as expected.
> 
> I do this by special-casing the interesting case.  On sigreturn,
> ucontext->ss will be honored by default, unless the ucontext was
> created from scratch by an old program and had a 64-bit CS
> (unfortunately, CRIU can do this) or was the result of changing a
> 32-bit signal context to 64-bit without resetting SS (as DOSEMU
> does).
> 
> For the benefit of new 64-bit software that uses segmentation (new
> versions of DOSEMU might), the new behavior can be detected with a
> new ucontext flag UC_SIGCONTEXT_SS.
> 
> To avoid compilation issues, __pad0 is left as an alias for ss in
> ucontext.
> 
> The nitty-gritty details are documented in the header file.
> 
> This patch also re-enables the sigreturn_64 and ldt_gdt_64 selftests,
> as the kernel change allows both of them to pass.
> 
> Cc: Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
> Tested-by: Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/sighandling.h     |  1 -
>  arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h |  7 ++--
>  arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/ucontext.h   | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++---
>  arch/x86/kernel/signal.c               | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile   |  7 ++--
>  5 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/sighandling.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/sighandling.h
> index 89db46752a8f..452c88b8ad06 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/sighandling.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/sighandling.h
> @@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
>  			 X86_EFLAGS_CF | X86_EFLAGS_RF)
>  
>  void signal_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, void __user *frame, char *where);
> -int restore_sigcontext(struct pt_regs *regs, struct sigcontext __user *sc);
>  int setup_sigcontext(struct sigcontext __user *sc, void __user *fpstate,
>  		     struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long mask);
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h
> index 47dae8150520..bb0dde737b59 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h
> @@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ struct sigcontext_64 {
>  	__u16				cs;
>  	__u16				gs;
>  	__u16				fs;
> -	__u16				__pad0;
> +	__u16				ss;
>  	__u64				err;
>  	__u64				trapno;
>  	__u64				oldmask;
> @@ -362,7 +362,10 @@ struct sigcontext {
>  	 */
>  	__u16				gs;
>  	__u16				fs;
> -	__u16				__pad0;
> +	union {
> +		__u16			ss;	/* If UC_SAVED_SS */
> +		__u16			__pad0;	/* If !UC_SAVED_SS */

						UC_SIGCONTEXT_SS ?

> +	};
>  	__u64				err;
>  	__u64				trapno;
>  	__u64				oldmask;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/ucontext.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/ucontext.h
> index b7c29c8017f2..a5c1718ce65b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/ucontext.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/ucontext.h
> @@ -1,11 +1,44 @@
>  #ifndef _ASM_X86_UCONTEXT_H
>  #define _ASM_X86_UCONTEXT_H
>  
> -#define UC_FP_XSTATE	0x1	/* indicates the presence of extended state
> -				 * information in the memory layout pointed
> -				 * by the fpstate pointer in the ucontext's
> -				 * sigcontext struct (uc_mcontext).
> -				 */
> +/*
> + * indicates the presence of extended state
> + * information in the memory layout pointed
> + * by the fpstate pointer in the ucontext's
> + * sigcontext struct (uc_mcontext).
> + */

Please reflow that comment to match the rest of the comments in this file.

> +#define UC_FP_XSTATE	0x1
> +
> +#ifdef __x86_64__
> +/*
> + * UC_SIGCONTEXT_SS will be set when delivering 64-bit or x32 signals on
> + * kernels that save SS in the sigcontext.  All kernels that set
> + * UC_SIGCONTEXT_SS will correctly restore at least the low 32 bits of esp
> + * regardless of SS (i.e. they implement espfix).
> + *
> + * Kernels that set UC_SIGCONTEXT_SS will also set UC_STRICT_RESTORE_SS
> + * when delivering a signal that came from 64-bit code.
> + *
> + * Sigreturn modifies its behavior depending on the
> + * UC_STRICT_RESTORE_SS flag.  If UC_STRICT_RESTORE_SS is set, or if
> + * the CS value in the signal context does not refer to a 64-bit
> + * code segment, then the SS value in the signal context is restored
> + * verbatim.  If UC_STRICT_RESTORE_SS is not set, the CS value in
> + * the signal context refers to a 64-bit code segment, and the
> + * signal context's SS value is invalid, then SS it will be replaced

s/it //

> + * with a flat 32-bit selector.
> +
> + * This behavior serves two purposes.  It ensures that older programs
> + * that are unaware of the signal context's SS slot and either construct
> + * a signal context from scratch or that catch signals from segmented
> + * contexts and change CS to a 64-bit selector won't crash due to a bad
> + * SS value.

I'm having hard time parsing that sentence and especially placing all
those "either", "or", "and" connectors at the proper levels. Would it be
more understandable as pseudocode?

> It also ensures that signal handlers that do not modify
> + * the signal context at all return back to the exact CS and SS state
> + * that they came from.

So my brain is reliably in a knot after this text.

> + */
> +#define UC_SIGCONTEXT_SS	0x2
> +#define UC_STRICT_RESTORE_SS	0x4
> +#endif
>  
>  #include <asm-generic/ucontext.h>
>  
-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-11 19:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-25 21:34 [PATCH v3 0/4] x86: sigcontext fixes, again Andy Lutomirski
2016-01-25 21:34 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] x86/signal/64: Add a comment about sigcontext->fs and gs Andy Lutomirski
2016-01-25 21:34 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] x86/signal/64: Fix SS if needed when delivering a 64-bit signal Andy Lutomirski
2016-02-09 12:06   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-25 21:34 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Andy Lutomirski
2016-02-11 19:49   ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2016-02-12  1:01     ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-02-12 13:56       ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-25 21:34 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] selftests/x86: Add tests for UC_SIGCONTEXT_SS and UC_STRICT_RESTORE_SS Andy Lutomirski
2016-02-11 19:53   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-02-12  0:46     ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-02-12 13:59       ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-26  8:22 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] x86: sigcontext fixes, again Cyrill Gorcunov
2016-01-26 19:51   ` Cyrill Gorcunov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160211194943.GH5565@pd.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=stsp@list.ru \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xemul@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome