From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752106AbcBOSK1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Feb 2016 13:10:27 -0500 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:52658 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751666AbcBOSKZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Feb 2016 13:10:25 -0500 Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:10:17 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Sudeep Holla Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rusty Russell , Liviu Dudau , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Liam Girdwood Message-ID: <20160215181017.GU18988@sirena.org.uk> References: <1454089021-24898-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <56BB8652.4000808@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZjLa2K+dB9SFbrgo" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56BB8652.4000808@arm.com> X-Cookie: Isn't this my STOP?! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:348:6:8808:fab::3 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: vexpress: rename vexpress regulator implementation X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --ZjLa2K+dB9SFbrgo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 06:49:54PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote: > On 29/01/16 17:37, Sudeep Holla wrote: > >The vexpress regulator implementation is currently just called vexpress. > >This is a problem because it clashes with another module with the same > >name in hardware monitors. > >This patch renames the vexpress regulator implementation to > >vexpress-regulator so that there will be no clash in the module namespace. > Can you take this patch for v4.6 ? It was reported @[1] Please allow a reasonable time for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes) please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. Sending content free pings just adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at all) and if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches anyway. > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/1/29/7 Please include human readable descriptions of things like commits and issues being discussed in e-mail in your mails, this makes them much easier for humans to read especially when they have no internet access. I do frequently catch up on my mail on flights or while otherwise travelling so this is even more pressing for me than just being about making things a bit easier to read. --ZjLa2K+dB9SFbrgo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWwhSIAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQL5YH/3JviaOqtDku589JFR3Qq8A9 cKtA+4ejrKa369eLi3GL6daU7hOfIPN6mUVM4/4h/wPokCuLeieRl+7mabFve5tr kKp6k5qYCr5cEAqinaaERldQQy6S86W7M91zu+Tbr6/17pK05uzyb0XR8ewydvFv QCbBn9TRmny15kePjVG3RRRhmW2csv6Hb25wRUMeGL9py5lcTxk2EBfzNvE80NyY pnli8dWxcXdi4Rdj55BIipyRDl7qz8igBDESrfYI5LC8f7rgJzdXw/TMNDqz9+JI 7DI0RD6iRug4dc2aEBhRnov0lxh9nKkaRGi4gtGgI8VWmo37waay4KN3hZTA7rg= =q7oW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZjLa2K+dB9SFbrgo--