From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932883AbcBPPD0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Feb 2016 10:03:26 -0500 Received: from smtprelay0214.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.214]:44470 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932782AbcBPPDY (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Feb 2016 10:03:24 -0500 X-Session-Marker: 726F737465647440676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,rostedt@goodmis.org,:::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:800:960:965:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1538:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2553:2559:2562:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3350:3622:3865:3866:3867:3871:3872:3873:3874:4390:5007:6261:7875:7903:10004:10400:10848:10967:11232:11658:11914:12517:12519:12663:12740:13069:13161:13229:13311:13357:14659:21080:30054:30090:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:2,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: bat38_678abacc71e X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1636 Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 10:03:21 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Denis Kirjanov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing/mm: don't trace kfree on offline CPUs Message-ID: <20160216100321.42f3ae8a@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20160216100121.6ef2145d@gandalf.local.home> References: <1455387773-4245-1-git-send-email-kda@linux-powerpc.org> <20160214114537.79a6dbb3@grimm.local.home> <20160215123256.6b4cc115@gandalf.local.home> <20160216100121.6ef2145d@gandalf.local.home> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.1 (GTK+ 2.24.29; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 10:01:21 -0500 Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > Does this work for you instead? > > > > Hm, somehow it doesn't work: > > But your patch works? Strange, because my exit condition is done before > the conditional part of the trace event. Thus, if this didn't work, > than your original patch should not work either. Anyway, I'm going to do the push to Linus with the patch, because there's been other locations that this has caused issues before. -- Steve