From: Andreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de>
To: clemens@ladisch.de, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, corbet@lwn.net, arnd@arndb.de,
peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
mst@redhat.com
Cc: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] hpet: Drop stale URLs
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:40:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160218064024.GA13272@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tip-4e7f9df25874cedbbc604a5c5c2e7a6efe662387@git.kernel.org>
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 04:14:54AM -0800, tip-bot for Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Commit-ID: 4e7f9df25874cedbbc604a5c5c2e7a6efe662387
> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/4e7f9df25874cedbbc604a5c5c2e7a6efe662387
> Author: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> AuthorDate: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 01:05:01 +0200
> Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> CommitDate: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:39:56 +0100
>
> hpet: Drop stale URLs
>
> Looks like the HPET spec at intel.com got moved.
> It isn't hard to find so drop the link, just mention
> the revision assumed.
While URLs unfortunately often are less permanent than possibly intended
(details see useful entire sub content of
"Aw: Re: Checkout hangs on invalid external URL"
http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2015-11/0027.shtml)
and thus too often need to be updated or even removed as a consequence,
I feel that once an URL as a very reliable reference has been lost,
naming of a file likely is the next most reliable fallback reference
(to at least have feeding into an Internet search engine
as the next fallback step).
An alternative/second reference
would have been listing the full title of this existing document, too.
Thus I'm questioning whether the exact file name
should in fact be removed here (at 3 locations even) by this commit,
while at least usefully adding
a (albeit somewhat weak) reference of "revision 1".
> The High Precision Event Timer (HPET) hardware follows a specification
> -by Intel and Microsoft which can be found at
> -
> - http://www.intel.com/hardwaredesign/hpetspec_1.pdf
> +by Intel and Microsoft, revision 1.
Oh, and I noticed as a curiosity (or so I thought)
that this cleanup-style work is (to be made?) part of "x86/urgent",
which I didn't expect to be defined as topically related.
Thanks,
Andreas Mohr
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-18 6:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-10 23:05 [PATCH v2] hpet: drop stale link Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-02-12 3:22 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2016-02-17 12:14 ` [tip:x86/urgent] hpet: Drop stale URLs tip-bot for Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-02-18 6:40 ` Andreas Mohr [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160218064024.GA13272@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de \
--to=andi@lisas.de \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=clemens@ladisch.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®