From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753411AbcBVFZG (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Feb 2016 00:25:06 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.220.43]:36089 "EHLO mail-pa0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752926AbcBVFZF (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Feb 2016 00:25:05 -0500 Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:54:46 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Eric Biggers Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: fix comment about return value of cpufreq_register_driver() Message-ID: <20160222052446.GD28226@vireshk-i7> References: <1456026601-31282-1-git-send-email-ebiggers3@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1456026601-31282-1-git-send-email-ebiggers3@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 20-02-16, 21:50, Eric Biggers wrote: > The comment has been incorrect since commit 4dea5806d332 > ("cpufreq: return EEXIST instead of EBUSY for second registering"). > > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers > --- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > index e979ec7..bfefc91 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > @@ -2384,7 +2384,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_boost_enabled); > * submitted by the CPU Frequency driver. > * > * Registers a CPU Frequency driver to this core code. This code > - * returns zero on success, -EBUSY when another driver got here first > + * returns zero on success, -EEXIST when another driver got here first > * (and isn't unregistered in the meantime). > * > */ Acked-by: Viresh Kumar -- viresh