From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754639AbcBVLgv (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Feb 2016 06:36:51 -0500 Received: from pandora.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:40742 "EHLO pandora.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754552AbcBVLgu (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Feb 2016 06:36:50 -0500 Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:36:25 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Masahiro Yamada Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , Michal Marek , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Damm , Kees Cook , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Roy Franz , Geert Uytterhoeven , Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: decompressor: several cleanups Message-ID: <20160222113625.GC19428@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1456126277-14633-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1456126277-14633-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 04:31:11PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Masahiro Yamada (6): > ARM: decompressor: drop unneeded assignments to "targets" > ARM: decompressor: drop more unneeded assignments to "targets" > ARM: decompressor: use clean-files instead of extra-y to clean files > ARM: decompressor: drop redundant FORCE in Makefile > ARM: decompressor: merge piggy.*.S and simplify Makefile > ARM: decompressor: rename suffix_y to compress-y Most of this looks fine to me, but I've a question about how thoroughly patch 5 has been tested: iow, do we get correct behaviour if only the compression method is changed? Thanks. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.