From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752707AbcBWPEa (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:04:30 -0500 Received: from smtprelay0211.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.211]:42061 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751655AbcBWPE2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:04:28 -0500 X-Session-Marker: 726F737465647440676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,rostedt@goodmis.org,:::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:800:960:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1538:1568:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2553:2559:2562:2693:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3622:3865:3868:3870:3872:3874:4362:5007:6261:7875:7885:8660:9040:10004:10400:10848:10967:11026:11232:11658:11914:12517:12519:12740:13069:13148:13221:13229:13230:13311:13357:14659:21080:30012:30054:30090:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:3,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: tray46_7df9a74b1d643 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1616 Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:04:24 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: LKML , Juri Lelli , Ingo Molnar , Clark Williams , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , John Kacur Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Always calculate end of period on sched_yield() Message-ID: <20160223100424.4ebfea45@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20160223122822.GP6357@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20160212181020.7dbaf326@gandalf.local.home> <20160223122822.GP6357@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.1 (GTK+ 2.24.29; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 13:28:22 +0100 Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Would something like this make sense instead? It works perfectly. Reported-by: Steven Rostedt Tested-by: Steven Rostedt Thanks! -- Steve > > It also retains the ->runtime while yielded, and would actually 'fix' a > case where, when we call yield, we would have had a negative runtime > after update_curr_dl(). > > The current code will 'gift' us extra runtime in that case. > > ---