From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751190AbcBWLbN (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Feb 2016 06:31:13 -0500 Received: from pandora.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:43351 "EHLO pandora.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750993AbcBWLbM (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Feb 2016 06:31:12 -0500 Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 11:30:59 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Mike Turquette , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: gpio: Really allow an optional clock= DT property Message-ID: <20160223113059.GH19428@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20160219030731.GS4847@codeaurora.org> <1455851525-18972-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1455851525-18972-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 07:12:05PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > We mis-merged the original patch from Russell here and so the > patch went almost all the way, except that we still failed to > probe when there wasn't a clocks property in the DT node. Allow > that case by making a negative value from > of_clk_get_parent_count() into "no parents", like the original > patch did. So you apply it anyway, and ignore all further discussion. I've no idea what kind of politics is going on here, but it has to stop. I'm also still waiting for that apology from Mike - never apply a modified patch without stating in the commit log that it was modified. It's basically fraud. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.