From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@suse.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
bp@alien8.de, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, luto@amacapital.net,
lguest@lists.ozlabs.org, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 10/11] x86/rtc: replace paravirt rtc check with x86 specific solution
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 19:10:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160223181051.GG25240@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56CC491C.8080505@citrix.com>
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 11:57:16AM +0000, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 23/02/16 07:24, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> [...]
> > @@ -1526,8 +1525,6 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __init xen_start_kernel(void)
> >
> > /* Install Xen paravirt ops */
> > pv_info = xen_info;
> > - if (xen_initial_domain())
> > - pv_info.features |= PV_SUPPORTED_RTC;
> > pv_init_ops = xen_init_ops;
> > if (!xen_pvh_domain()) {
> > pv_cpu_ops = xen_cpu_ops;
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/time.c b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
> > index a0a4e554c6f1..fbfcb01015f0 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/xen/time.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
> > @@ -446,8 +446,10 @@ void __init xen_init_time_ops(void)
> > x86_platform.calibrate_tsc = xen_tsc_khz;
> > x86_platform.get_wallclock = xen_get_wallclock;
> > /* Dom0 uses the native method to set the hardware RTC. */
> > - if (!xen_initial_domain())
> > + if (!xen_initial_domain()) {
> > + x86_init.platform_flags |= X86_PLATFORM_NO_RTC;
> > x86_platform.set_wallclock = xen_set_wallclock;
> > + }
> > }
>
> Is this an early enough point to set this flag?
I'm glad you asked, I should have explained how I confirmed this on the commit
log as well. The answer is yes, even though I haven't tested it, but logically
I've confirmed this given that rtc is initialized via device_initcall(add_rtc_cmos);
-- these get called late in boot, way after setup_arch() during rest_init().
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-23 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-23 7:24 [PATCH v3 00/11] x86/init: replace paravirt_enabled() were possible Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-23 7:24 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] x86/boot: enumerate documentation for the x86 hardware_subarch Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-23 8:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-02-23 10:34 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-23 20:41 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-24 8:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-02-24 16:40 ` Andy Lutomirski
[not found] ` <CAB=NE6X0S-iXV_0t+JEE9zstE-+CfVZrU-WidyMk1dPJMi-hhQ@mail.gmail.com>
2016-02-25 1:29 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-02-25 8:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-02 0:43 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-03-02 19:40 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 20:59 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-23 7:24 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] tools/lguest: make lguest launcher use X86_SUBARCH_LGUEST explicitly Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-23 7:24 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] x86/xen: use X86_SUBARCH_XEN for PV guest boots Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-23 7:24 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] x86/init: make ebda depend on PC subarch Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-23 7:24 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] tools/lguest: force disable tboot and apm Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-23 7:24 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] apm32: remove paravirt_enabled() use Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-23 7:24 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] x86/tboot: remove paravirt_enabled() Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-23 7:24 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] x86/cpu/intel: replace paravirt_enabled() for f00f work around Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-23 7:24 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] x86/boot: add BIT() to boot/bitops.h Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-23 7:24 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] x86/rtc: replace paravirt rtc check with x86 specific solution Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-23 11:57 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2016-02-23 18:10 ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
2016-02-23 7:24 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] pnpbios: replace paravirt_enabled() check with subarch checks Luis R. Rodriguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160223181051.GG25240@wotan.suse.de \
--to=mcgrof@suse.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=lguest@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®