From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755473AbcBZW7J (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Feb 2016 17:59:09 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48222 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754818AbcBZW7H (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Feb 2016 17:59:07 -0500 Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 23:59:03 +0100 From: Jiri Olsa To: Josh Boyer Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , "Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" Subject: Re: perf install-python_ext installing .o files in python site-packages Message-ID: <20160226225903.GA7069@krava.redhat.com> References: <20160226211435.GB19398@krava.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 05:49:02PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: SNIP > > ./python_ext_build/tmp/home/jolsa/kernel/linux-perf/tools/perf/util/evsel.o > > ./python_ext_build/tmp/home/jolsa/kernel/linux-perf/tools/perf/util/trace-event.o > > ./python_ext_build/tmp/home/jolsa/kernel/linux-perf/tools/perf/util/xyarray.o > > ./python_ext_build/tmp/home/jolsa/kernel/linux-perf/tools/perf/util/python.o > > ./python_ext_build/tmp/home/jolsa/kernel/linux-perf/tools/perf/util/ctype.o > > ./python_ext_build/tmp/home/jolsa/kernel/linux-perf/tools/perf/util/cgroup.o > > ./python_ext_build/tmp/home/jolsa/kernel/linux-perf/tools/perf/util/rblist.o > > ./python_ext_build/tmp/home/jolsa/kernel/linux-perf/tools/perf/util/string.o > > ./python_ext_build/tmp/home/jolsa/kernel/linux-perf/tools/lib > > ./python_ext_build/tmp/home/jolsa/kernel/linux-perf/tools/lib/hweight.o > > ./python_ext_build/tmp/home/jolsa/kernel/linux-perf/tools/lib/rbtree.o > > ./python_ext_build/tmp/home/jolsa/kernel/linux-perf/tools/lib/bitmap.o > > ./python_ext_build/tmp/home/jolsa/kernel/linux-perf/tools/lib/find_bit.o > > > > not sure we want to come up with some 'nicer' solution > > I don't think anything under python_ext_build/tmp/ actually matters in > any significant way. As long as this doesn't negatively impact > something via side-effect, it's probably good enough. right, and it's probably generic sollution too > > Will you write up a full patch? yep, will post it tomorrow jirka