mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Nauman Rafique <nauman@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH v2 block/for-linus] writeback: flush inode cgroup wb switches instead of pinning super_block
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:28:53 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160229232853.GD3965@htj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160229204724.GV3965@htj.duckdns.org>

If cgroup writeback is in use, inodes can be scheduled for
asynchronous wb switching.  Before 5ff8eaac1636 ("writeback: keep
superblock pinned during cgroup writeback association switches"), this
could race with umount leading to super_block being destroyed while
inodes are pinned for wb switching.  5ff8eaac1636 fixed it by bumping
s_active while wb switches are in flight; however, this allowed
in-flight wb switches to make umounts asynchronous when the userland
expected synchronosity - e.g. fsck immediately following umount may
fail because the device is still busy.

This patch removes the problematic super_block pinning and instead
makes generic_shutdown_super() flush in-flight wb switches.  wb
switches are now executed on a dedicated isw_wq so that they can be
flushed and isw_nr_in_flight keeps track of the number of in-flight wb
switches so that flushing can be avoided in most cases.

v2: Move cgroup_writeback_umount() further below and add MS_ACTIVE
    check in inode_switch_wbs() as Jan an Al suggested.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/g/CAAeU0aNCq7LGODvVGRU-oU_o-6enii5ey0p1c26D1ZzYwkDc5A@mail.gmail.com
Fixes: 5ff8eaac1636 ("writeback: keep superblock pinned during cgroup writeback association switches")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #v4.5
---
 fs/fs-writeback.c         |   54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 fs/super.c                |    1 
 include/linux/writeback.h |    5 ++++
 3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -223,6 +223,9 @@ static void wb_wait_for_completion(struc
 #define WB_FRN_HIST_MAX_SLOTS	(WB_FRN_HIST_THR_SLOTS / 2 + 1)
 					/* one round can affect upto 5 slots */
 
+static atomic_t isw_nr_in_flight = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
+static struct workqueue_struct *isw_wq;
+
 void __inode_attach_wb(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
 {
 	struct backing_dev_info *bdi = inode_to_bdi(inode);
@@ -317,7 +320,6 @@ static void inode_switch_wbs_work_fn(str
 	struct inode_switch_wbs_context *isw =
 		container_of(work, struct inode_switch_wbs_context, work);
 	struct inode *inode = isw->inode;
-	struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
 	struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
 	struct bdi_writeback *old_wb = inode->i_wb;
 	struct bdi_writeback *new_wb = isw->new_wb;
@@ -424,8 +426,9 @@ skip_switch:
 	wb_put(new_wb);
 
 	iput(inode);
-	deactivate_super(sb);
 	kfree(isw);
+
+	atomic_dec(&isw_nr_in_flight);
 }
 
 static void inode_switch_wbs_rcu_fn(struct rcu_head *rcu_head)
@@ -435,7 +438,7 @@ static void inode_switch_wbs_rcu_fn(stru
 
 	/* needs to grab bh-unsafe locks, bounce to work item */
 	INIT_WORK(&isw->work, inode_switch_wbs_work_fn);
-	schedule_work(&isw->work);
+	queue_work(isw_wq, &isw->work);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -471,20 +474,20 @@ static void inode_switch_wbs(struct inod
 
 	/* while holding I_WB_SWITCH, no one else can update the association */
 	spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
-
-	if (inode->i_state & (I_WB_SWITCH | I_FREEING) ||
-	    inode_to_wb(inode) == isw->new_wb)
-		goto out_unlock;
-
-	if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&inode->i_sb->s_active))
-		goto out_unlock;
-
+	if (!(inode->i_sb->s_flags & MS_ACTIVE) ||
+	    inode->i_state & (I_WB_SWITCH | I_FREEING) ||
+	    inode_to_wb(inode) == isw->new_wb) {
+		spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+		goto out_free;
+	}
 	inode->i_state |= I_WB_SWITCH;
 	spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
 
 	ihold(inode);
 	isw->inode = inode;
 
+	atomic_inc(&isw_nr_in_flight);
+
 	/*
 	 * In addition to synchronizing among switchers, I_WB_SWITCH tells
 	 * the RCU protected stat update paths to grab the mapping's
@@ -494,8 +497,6 @@ static void inode_switch_wbs(struct inod
 	call_rcu(&isw->rcu_head, inode_switch_wbs_rcu_fn);
 	return;
 
-out_unlock:
-	spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
 out_free:
 	if (isw->new_wb)
 		wb_put(isw->new_wb);
@@ -847,6 +848,33 @@ restart:
 		wb_put(last_wb);
 }
 
+/**
+ * cgroup_writeback_umount - flush inode wb switches for umount
+ *
+ * This function is called when a super_block is about to be destroyed and
+ * flushes in-flight inode wb switches.  An inode wb switch goes through
+ * RCU and then workqueue, so the two need to be flushed in order to ensure
+ * that all previously scheduled switches are finished.  As wb switches are
+ * rare occurrences and synchronize_rcu() can take a while, perform
+ * flushing iff wb switches are in flight.
+ */
+void cgroup_writeback_umount(void)
+{
+	if (atomic_read(&isw_nr_in_flight)) {
+		synchronize_rcu();
+		flush_workqueue(isw_wq);
+	}
+}
+
+static int __init cgroup_writeback_init(void)
+{
+	isw_wq = alloc_workqueue("inode_switch_wbs", 0, 0);
+	if (!isw_wq)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	return 0;
+}
+fs_initcall(cgroup_writeback_init);
+
 #else	/* CONFIG_CGROUP_WRITEBACK */
 
 static struct bdi_writeback *
--- a/fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/super.c
@@ -415,6 +415,7 @@ void generic_shutdown_super(struct super
 		sb->s_flags &= ~MS_ACTIVE;
 
 		fsnotify_unmount_inodes(sb);
+		cgroup_writeback_umount();
 
 		evict_inodes(sb);
 
--- a/include/linux/writeback.h
+++ b/include/linux/writeback.h
@@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ void wbc_attach_and_unlock_inode(struct
 void wbc_detach_inode(struct writeback_control *wbc);
 void wbc_account_io(struct writeback_control *wbc, struct page *page,
 		    size_t bytes);
+void cgroup_writeback_umount(void);
 
 /**
  * inode_attach_wb - associate an inode with its wb
@@ -301,6 +302,10 @@ static inline void wbc_account_io(struct
 {
 }
 
+static inline void cgroup_writeback_umount(void)
+{
+}
+
 #endif	/* CONFIG_CGROUP_WRITEBACK */
 
 /*

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-02-29 23:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAAeU0aNCq7LGODvVGRU-oU_o-6enii5ey0p1c26D1ZzYwkDc5A@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <20160215210047.GN3965@htj.duckdns.org>
     [not found]   ` <CAAeU0aNAd1Ra6LXmWwq8row4MD_BpVHiSXOwHx07m86UWREvHw@mail.gmail.com>
2016-02-16 18:24     ` [PATCH block/for-4.5-fixes] writeback: keep superblock pinned during cgroup writeback association switches Tejun Heo
2016-02-16 18:34       ` Jens Axboe
2016-02-17 20:57       ` Jan Kara
2016-02-17 21:07         ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-17 22:30           ` Jan Kara
2016-02-17 22:41             ` Tahsin Erdogan
2016-02-17 23:02               ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-18  9:55                 ` Jan Kara
2016-02-18 13:00                   ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-18 13:20                     ` Jan Kara
2016-02-19 20:18                     ` Al Viro
2016-02-19 20:51                       ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-19 21:58                         ` Al Viro
2016-02-19 22:15                           ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-19 22:26                             ` Al Viro
2016-02-28 21:53                               ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-29 20:47                 ` [PATCH block/for-linus] writeback: flush inode cgroup wb switches instead of pinning super_block Tejun Heo
2016-02-29 20:54                   ` Al Viro
2016-02-29 20:58                     ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-29 21:06                       ` Al Viro
2016-02-29 21:08                         ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-29 21:21                           ` Jan Kara
2016-02-29 23:28                   ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2016-03-01  9:20                     ` [PATCH v2 " Jan Kara
2016-03-01 17:46                     ` Jens Axboe
2016-03-01 17:50                       ` Tejun Heo
2016-03-02 10:29                         ` Jan Kara
2016-03-01 13:39                   ` [PATCH " Tahsin Erdogan
2016-02-18 10:12       ` [PATCH block/for-4.5-fixes] writeback: keep superblock pinned during cgroup writeback association switches Nikolay Borisov
2016-02-18 12:57         ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160229232853.GD3965@htj.duckdns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nauman@google.com \
    --cc=tahsin@google.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome