From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932536AbcCBBAz (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Mar 2016 20:00:55 -0500 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:46899 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755881AbcCBBAx (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Mar 2016 20:00:53 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,524,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="914841819" Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 16:58:18 -0800 From: Yu-cheng Yu To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski , Borislav Petkov , Sai Praneeth Prakhya , "Ravi V. Shankar" , Fenghua Yu Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 9/9] x86/xsaves: Re-enable XSAVES Message-ID: <20160302005818.GA30963@test-lenovo> References: <787ba3e73f657b06c02464ae522a47905ed503b8.1456524359.git.yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <56D62C1C.3050806@linux.intel.com> <20160302003443.GA30899@test-lenovo> <56D637B5.3030907@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 04:53:53PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Differences between i386 and x86-64 generally add problems, so unless this requires significant 32-bit-specific code we should not exclude i386 just because. I have not seen any issues with 32-bit code, but will do some tests. Thanks. Yu-cheng