From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932307AbcCHKL5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2016 05:11:57 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:56157 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753551AbcCHKLn (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2016 05:11:43 -0500 Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 11:11:34 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Tejun Heo Cc: lizefan@huawei.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cgroup, perf_event: make perf_event controller work on cgroup2 hierarchy Message-ID: <20160308101133.GW6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1456351975-1899-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1456351975-1899-3-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1456351975-1899-3-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 05:12:55PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote: > perf_event is a utility controller whose primary role is identifying > cgroup membership to filter perf events; however, because it also > tracks some per-css state, it can't be replaced by pure cgroup > membership test. Mark the controller as implicitly enabled on the > default hierarchy so that perf events can always be filtered based on > cgroup v2 path as long as the controller is not mounted on a legacy > hierarchy. > > "perf record" is updated accordingly so that it searches for both v1 > and v2 hierarchies. A v1 hierarchy is used if perf_event is mounted > on it; otherwise, it uses the v2 hierarchy. > > v2: Doc updated to reflect more flexible rebinding behavior. > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo > Cc: Peter Zijlstra Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) > Cc: Ingo Molnar > Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Arnaldo, do the userspace bits look ok?