From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S965344AbcCIXsg (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 9 Mar 2016 18:48:36 -0500
Received: from LGEAMRELO13.lge.com ([156.147.23.53]:46694 "EHLO
	lgeamrelo13.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S934509AbcCIXsX (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 9 Mar 2016 18:48:23 -0500
X-Original-SENDERIP: 156.147.1.151
X-Original-MAILFROM: byungchul.park@lge.com
X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.222.33
X-Original-MAILFROM: byungchul.park@lge.com
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 08:48:17 +0900
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
To: Andrew Hunter <ahh@google.com>
Cc: pavankumar kondeti <pavankumar.kondeti@gmail.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Pavan Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
        Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
        Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Subject: Re: Migrated CFS task getting an unfair advantage
Message-ID: <20160309234817.GB5220@X58A-UD3R>
References: <CAEU1=PnHOwPmt80QWvc5RO096VpNyoxQDAcYCpQRrR+4PpRsOQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160309120403.GK6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <CAEU1=P=q4beYrMFZj3Q3OCxsYpuG-yCogcBv3AyXaP2i6pPkHQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADroS=6Ncpao6WWXBxboB6quqUP96EnjbsDUZqNgASd_PzDGaA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CADroS=6Ncpao6WWXBxboB6quqUP96EnjbsDUZqNgASd_PzDGaA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 11:00:42AM -0800, Andrew Hunter wrote:
> At Google, we essentially reverted 88ec22d and the subsequent tweaks
> to it, keeping vruntime absolute always , instead using
> task_move_group_fair to change the basis of relative min_vruntime

Hello, Andrew

I am curious about how it can be done with absolute value. :-)

> between cpus.  We found this made it a lot easier to reason about and
> work with corss-cpu computations.  I could post the patch if it would
> be of interest...

I am interested in it.

Thanks,
Byungchul

>