From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1756005AbcCNTtv (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:49:51 -0400
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:49249 "EHLO
	shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1755505AbcCNTtt (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:49:49 -0400
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:49:45 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20160314.154945.1770938851011099663.davem@davemloft.net>
To: gregory.clement@free-electrons.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com, jason@lakedaemon.net,
        andrew@lunn.ch, sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, alior@marvell.com,
        nadavh@marvell.com, mw@semihalf.com, patrick@puiterwijk.org,
        dima@marvell.com, oferh@marvell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 0/4] Few mvneta fixes
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <1457804660-8463-1-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
References: <1457804660-8463-1-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.6 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Mon, 14 Mar 2016 12:49:48 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

From: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 18:44:16 +0100

> In this second version I split the last patch in two parts as
> requested.
> 
> For the record the initial cover letter was:
> "here is a patch set of few fixes. Without the first one, a kernel
> configured with debug features ended to hang when the driver is built
> as a module and is removed. This is quite is annoying for debugging!
> 
> The second patch fix a forgotten flag at the initial submission of the
> driver.
> 
> The third patch is only really a cosmetic one so I have no problem to
> not apply it for 4.5 and wait for 4.6.
> 
> I really would like to see the first one applied for 4.5 and for the
> second I let you judge if it something needed for now or that should
> wait the next release."

Series applied and patches #1 and #2 queued up for -stable, thanks.