mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Kazuki Yamaguchi <k@rhe.jp>,
	Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@axis.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] sched: leaf_cfs_rq_list use after free
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:49:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160316174912.GA21104@mtj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160316170456.GC6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 06:04:56PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Hmmm... I don't think it'd be safe to merge the two ops.  Nothing
> > guarantees that the RCU callback of cpu controller is called after the
> > cgroup core one and cgroup core one would do use-after-free.  Just
> > changing offline to released should do.
> 
> I'm confused, the code looks like:
> 
> static void cpu_cgroup_css_released(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
> {
> 	struct task_group *tg = css_tg(css);
> 
> 	sched_offline_group(tg);
> }
> 
> static void cpu_cgroup_css_free(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
> {
> 	struct task_group *tg = css_tg(css);
> 
> 	/*
> 	 * Relies on the RCU grace period between css_release() and this.
> 	 */
> 	sched_free_group(tg);
> }

Oops, misread the two functions swapping positions as getting merged.
Yes, that is correct.  Sorry about the confusion.  Please feel free to
add

 Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-16 17:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-12  9:42 Kazuki Yamaguchi
2016-03-12 13:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-14 11:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-14 12:09   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-16 14:24     ` Tejun Heo
2016-03-16 14:44       ` Tejun Heo
2016-03-16 15:22       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-16 16:50         ` Tejun Heo
2016-03-16 17:04           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-16 17:49             ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2016-03-17  8:29         ` Niklas Cassel
2016-03-21 11:15         ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched/cgroup: Fix/cleanup cgroup teardown/init tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-28 18:40           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-28 18:51             ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2016-04-28 21:36               ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-02  3:06                 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-03-04 10:41 [BUG] sched: leaf_cfs_rq_list use after free Niklas Cassel
2016-03-10 12:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-11 17:02   ` Niklas Cassel
2016-03-11 17:28     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-11 18:20   ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160316174912.GA21104@mtj.duckdns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=k@rhe.jp \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=niklas.cassel@axis.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®