From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Kazuki Yamaguchi <k@rhe.jp>,
Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@axis.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] sched: leaf_cfs_rq_list use after free
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:49:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160316174912.GA21104@mtj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160316170456.GC6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 06:04:56PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Hmmm... I don't think it'd be safe to merge the two ops. Nothing
> > guarantees that the RCU callback of cpu controller is called after the
> > cgroup core one and cgroup core one would do use-after-free. Just
> > changing offline to released should do.
>
> I'm confused, the code looks like:
>
> static void cpu_cgroup_css_released(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
> {
> struct task_group *tg = css_tg(css);
>
> sched_offline_group(tg);
> }
>
> static void cpu_cgroup_css_free(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
> {
> struct task_group *tg = css_tg(css);
>
> /*
> * Relies on the RCU grace period between css_release() and this.
> */
> sched_free_group(tg);
> }
Oops, misread the two functions swapping positions as getting merged.
Yes, that is correct. Sorry about the confusion. Please feel free to
add
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-16 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-12 9:42 Kazuki Yamaguchi
2016-03-12 13:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-14 11:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-14 12:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-16 14:24 ` Tejun Heo
2016-03-16 14:44 ` Tejun Heo
2016-03-16 15:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-16 16:50 ` Tejun Heo
2016-03-16 17:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-16 17:49 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2016-03-17 8:29 ` Niklas Cassel
2016-03-21 11:15 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched/cgroup: Fix/cleanup cgroup teardown/init tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-28 18:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-28 18:51 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2016-04-28 21:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-02 3:06 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-03-04 10:41 [BUG] sched: leaf_cfs_rq_list use after free Niklas Cassel
2016-03-10 12:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-11 17:02 ` Niklas Cassel
2016-03-11 17:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-11 18:20 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160316174912.GA21104@mtj.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=k@rhe.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=niklas.cassel@axis.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®