From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Eva Rachel Retuya <eraretuya@gmail.com>,
outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com, emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com,
linuxwifi@intel.com, kvalo@codeaurora.org,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwlwifi: dvm: convert create_singlethread_workqueue() to alloc_workqueue()
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 06:21:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160317132110.GP21104@mtj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458218602.2158.17.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Hello,
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 01:43:22PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-03-17 at 20:37 +0800, Eva Rachel Retuya wrote:
> > Use alloc_workqueue() to allocate the workqueue instead of
> > create_singlethread_workqueue() since the latter is deprecated and is
> > scheduled for removal.
>
> Scheduled where?
They've been deprecated for years now. I should note that in the
header.
> > static void iwl_setup_deferred_work(struct iwl_priv *priv)
> > {
> > - priv->workqueue = create_singlethread_workqueue(DRV_NAME);
> > + priv->workqueue = alloc_workqueue(DRV_NAME, WQ_HIGHPRI |
> > WQ_UNBOUND |
> > + WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 1);
>
> Seems like you should use alloc_ordered_workqueue() though? That also
> gets you UNBOUND immediately, and the "1".
Right, this one should have been alloc_ordered_workqueue().
> I'm not really sure HIGHPRI is needed either.
So, no WQ_MEM_RECLAIM either then, I suppose? What are the latency
requirements here - what happens if a thermal management work gets
delayed?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-17 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-17 12:37 Eva Rachel Retuya
2016-03-17 12:43 ` Johannes Berg
2016-03-17 13:21 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2016-03-17 13:48 ` Grumbach, Emmanuel
2016-03-17 12:43 ` Grumbach, Emmanuel
2016-03-17 13:18 ` tj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160317132110.GP21104@mtj.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com \
--cc=eraretuya@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxwifi@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®