mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] ftrace perf: Move exclude_kernel tracepoint check to init event
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 11:41:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160323104129.GZ6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458138873-1553-3-git-send-email-jolsa@kernel.org>

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 03:34:30PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> We suppress events with attr::exclude_kernel set when
> the event is generated, so following capture will
> give no warning but won't produce any data:
> 
>   $ sudo perf record -e sched:sched_switch:u ls
>   $ sudo /perf script | wc -l
>   0
> 
> Checking the attr::exclude_(kernel|user) at the event
> init time and failing right away for tracepoints from
> uprobes/kprobes and native ones:
> 
>   $ sudo perf record -e sched:sched_switch:u ls
>   Error:
>   The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 22 (Invalid argument) for event (sched:sched_switch).
>   /bin/dmesg may provide additional information.
>   No CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS=y kernel support configured?
> 
>   $ sudo perf record -e probe:sys_read:u ls
>   Error:
>   The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 22 (Invalid argument) for event (probe:sys_read).
>   /bin/dmesg may provide additional information.
>   No CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS=y kernel support configured?
> 
>   $ ./perf record -e probe_ex:main:k ./ex
>   Error:
>   The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 22 (Invalid argument) for event (probe_ex:main).
>   /bin/dmesg may provide additional information.
>   No CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS=y kernel support configured?

Not sure about this one. The previous behaviour suggests
exclude_{user,kernel} is implemented, while the new behaviour says these
flags are not implemented, which is a functional regression.

That is, if all events are from kernel space, and we exclude all kernel
events, 0 is the right answer not an error.

Sure, with uprobes the situation is currently broken, but this isn't a
fix.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-03-23 11:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-16 14:34 [PATCHv2 0/5] ftrace perf: Fixes and speedup Jiri Olsa
2016-03-16 14:34 ` [PATCH 1/5] ftrace perf: Check sample types only for sampling events Jiri Olsa
2016-03-18 14:27   ` Steven Rostedt
2016-03-31  9:25   ` [tip:perf/core] ftrace/perf: " tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
2016-03-16 14:34 ` [PATCH 2/5] ftrace perf: Move exclude_kernel tracepoint check to init event Jiri Olsa
2016-03-18 14:28   ` Steven Rostedt
2016-03-23 10:41   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-03-24  9:56     ` Jiri Olsa
2016-03-24 10:49       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-24 12:25         ` Jiri Olsa
2016-03-24 13:00           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-24 13:30             ` Jiri Olsa
2016-03-16 14:34 ` [PATCH 3/5] ftrace perf: Use ftrace_ops::private to store event pointer Jiri Olsa
2016-03-18 14:28   ` Steven Rostedt
2016-03-23 14:26   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-24  9:47     ` Jiri Olsa
2016-03-24 10:40       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-16 14:34 ` [PATCH 4/5] ftrace: Make ftrace_hash_rec_enable return update bool Jiri Olsa
2016-03-17  0:23   ` Namhyung Kim
2016-03-16 14:34 ` [PATCH 5/5] ftrace: Update dynamic ftrace calls only if necessary Jiri Olsa
2016-03-17  0:25   ` Namhyung Kim
2016-03-18 14:27   ` Steven Rostedt
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-03-09 20:46 [RFC 0/5] ftrace perf: Fixes and speedup Jiri Olsa
2016-03-09 20:46 ` [PATCH 2/5] ftrace perf: Move exclude_kernel tracepoint check to init event Jiri Olsa
2016-03-10  0:39   ` Namhyung Kim
2016-03-11  8:39     ` Jiri Olsa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160323104129.GZ6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome