From: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@gmail.com>
To: lidza.louina@gmail.com
Cc: markh@compro.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, wharms@bfs.de
Subject: [PATCH V2] staging: dgnc: replace dgnc_offset_table with bit shift.
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 13:54:15 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160328045415.GA586@SEL-JYOUN-D1> (raw)
the dgnc_offset_table has a same value with (1 << port).
So I tried to replace dgnc_offset_table array with 1 << port.
And also there are redundant assignments(tmp and current_port)
inside while loop for checking uart port, and remove them.
Signed-off-by: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@gmail.com>
---
V2: clean up useless variables and increasing port value is just
for traversing all port with uart_poll. So It need to replace
'continue' with 'break' in switch statement and last of this function,
move onto next port.
drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c | 44 +++++++++++------------------------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c
index d732e6e..6b57c44 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c
@@ -77,9 +77,6 @@ struct board_ops dgnc_neo_ops = {
.send_immediate_char = neo_send_immediate_char
};
-static uint dgnc_offset_table[8] = { 0x01, 0x02, 0x04, 0x08,
- 0x10, 0x20, 0x40, 0x80 };
-
/*
* This function allows calls to ensure that all outstanding
* PCI writes have been completed, by doing a PCI read against
@@ -923,9 +920,7 @@ static irqreturn_t neo_intr(int irq, void *voidbrd)
struct dgnc_board *brd = voidbrd;
struct channel_t *ch;
int port = 0;
- int type = 0;
- int current_port;
- u32 tmp;
+ int type;
u32 uart_poll;
unsigned long flags;
unsigned long flags2;
@@ -960,29 +955,12 @@ static irqreturn_t neo_intr(int irq, void *voidbrd)
/* At this point, we have at least SOMETHING to service, dig further... */
- current_port = 0;
-
/* Loop on each port */
while ((uart_poll & 0xff) != 0) {
- tmp = uart_poll;
-
- /* Check current port to see if it has interrupt pending */
- if ((tmp & dgnc_offset_table[current_port]) != 0) {
- port = current_port;
- type = tmp >> (8 + (port * 3));
- type &= 0x7;
- } else {
- current_port++;
- continue;
- }
-
- /* Remove this port + type from uart_poll */
- uart_poll &= ~(dgnc_offset_table[port]);
+ type = uart_poll >> (8 + (port * 3));
+ type &= 0x7;
- if (!type) {
- /* If no type, just ignore it, and move onto next port */
- continue;
- }
+ uart_poll &= ~(0x01 << port);
/* Switch on type of interrupt we have */
switch (type) {
@@ -994,7 +972,7 @@ static irqreturn_t neo_intr(int irq, void *voidbrd)
/* Verify the port is in range. */
if (port >= brd->nasync)
- continue;
+ break;
ch = brd->channels[port];
neo_copy_data_from_uart_to_queue(ch);
@@ -1004,14 +982,14 @@ static irqreturn_t neo_intr(int irq, void *voidbrd)
dgnc_check_queue_flow_control(ch);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ch->ch_lock, flags2);
- continue;
+ break;
case UART_17158_RX_LINE_STATUS:
/*
* RXRDY and RX LINE Status (logic OR of LSR[4:1])
*/
neo_parse_lsr(brd, port);
- continue;
+ break;
case UART_17158_TXRDY:
/*
@@ -1027,14 +1005,14 @@ static irqreturn_t neo_intr(int irq, void *voidbrd)
* it should be, I was getting things like RXDY too. Weird.
*/
neo_parse_isr(brd, port);
- continue;
+ break;
case UART_17158_MSR:
/*
* MSR or flow control was seen.
*/
neo_parse_isr(brd, port);
- continue;
+ break;
default:
/*
@@ -1043,8 +1021,10 @@ static irqreturn_t neo_intr(int irq, void *voidbrd)
* these once and awhile.
* Its harmless, just ignore it and move on.
*/
- continue;
+ break;
}
+
+ port++;
}
/*
--
1.9.1
reply other threads:[~2016-03-28 4:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160328045415.GA586@SEL-JYOUN-D1 \
--to=daeseok.youn@gmail.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lidza.louina@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markh@compro.net \
--cc=wharms@bfs.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®