From: Florian Zumbiehl <florz@florz.de>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Subject: i951 ERRORs and WARN_ON()s (was: blank screen on boot with i915/DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION)
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 01:14:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160330231430.GC6652@florz.florz.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160330062957.GB2510@phenom.ffwll.local>
Hi,
> We've fixed piles of those in recent kernels, but didn't backport all the
> fixes (since usually it's a silent failure, but it can correlate with
> black screens).
Not quite completely, it seems ...
I have built drm-intel-nightly (f261f82359), and I'm getting this:
| [ 15.855007] [drm:intel_cpu_fifo_underrun_irq_handler [i915]] *ERROR* CPU pipe A FIFO underrun
| [ 15.855007] [drm:intel_set_cpu_fifo_underrun_reporting [i915]] *ERROR* pipe B underrun
| [ 15.855007] [drm:intel_cpu_fifo_underrun_irq_handler [i915]] *ERROR* CPU pipe B FIFO underrun
| [ 15.863175] [drm] RC6 disabled, disabling runtime PM support
| [ 15.863543] [drm] initialized overlay support
| [ 15.933338] [drm:intel_cpu_fifo_underrun_irq_handler [i915]] *ERROR* CPU pipe A FIFO underrun
| [ 15.997130] i915 0000:00:02.0: fb0: inteldrmfb frame buffer device
| [ 16.061856] [drm:intel_set_cpu_fifo_underrun_reporting [i915]] *ERROR* pipe A underrun
| [ 16.725274] [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20160330 for 0000:00:02.0 on minor 0
| [ 16.805727] [drm:intel_cpu_fifo_underrun_irq_handler [i915]] *ERROR* CPU pipe A FIFO underrun
> > | [ 2520.457732] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 3193 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:4508 i915_gem_free_object+0x277/0x280 [i915]()
> > | [ 2520.457736] WARN_ON(obj->frontbuffer_bits)
>
> Hm, this one should be fixed, and the patches should all be correctly
> marked for stable. Either there's a backlog somewhere, or we failed.
>
> Would be great if you can test a drm-intel-nightly build (or 4.6-rc1) for
> either and confirm that they're gone. And for the later we really should
> hunt down the bugfix if it's stuck.
| [ 141.999803] ------------[ cut here ]------------
| [ 141.999916] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 3349 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:4568 i915_gem_free_object+0x25f/0x270 [i915]
| [ 141.999923] WARN_ON(obj->frontbuffer_bits)
| [ 141.999928] Modules linked in: ipt_MASQUERADE nf_nat_masquerade_ipv4 xt_CT iptable_raw xt_nat xt_tcpudp xt_addrtype iptable_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 nf_nat_ipv4 nf_nat nf_conntrack ip_tables x_tables dummy tun nfsd exportfs nfs lockd grace sunrpc ipv6 fbcon bitblit softcursor font loop mousedev i915 i2c_algo_bit drm_kms_helper cfbfillrect syscopyarea cfbimgblt sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops cfbcopyarea snd_intel8x0 drm snd_ac97_codec ac97_bus i2c_core snd_pcm_oss fb snd_mixer_oss fbdev snd_pcm ipw2200 snd_timer snd libipw soundcore lib80211 nsc_ircc thinkpad_acpi cfg80211 pcmcia psmouse sdhci_pci irda uhci_hcd ehci_pci sdhci crc_ccitt ehci_hcd serio_raw e1000 mmc_core nvram evdev usbcore parport_pc yenta_socket hwmon parport pcmcia_rsrc video usb_common pcmcia_core backlight ac battery acpi_cpufreq intel_agp processor button intel_gtt agpgart twofish_generic twofish_i586 twofish_common xts gf128mul dm_crypt dm_mod thermal
| [ 142.000114] CPU: 0 PID: 3349 Comm: Xorg Not tainted 4.6.0-rc1+ #1
| [ 142.000120] Hardware name: IBM 23716JG/23716JG, BIOS 1UETD3WW (2.08 ) 12/21/2006
| [ 142.000127] c11b8f7a c1037247 f8dea59b c0051dc4 00000d15 f8dda000 000011d8 f8d3ff2f
| [ 142.000141] f8d3ff2f 000011d8 f3ef1dcc f3ef1e30 f3ef1dcc f3ef1dc0 c1037309 00000009
| [ 142.000154] 00000000 c0051dac f8dea59b c0051dc4 f8d3ff2f f8dda000 000011d8 f8dea59b
| [ 142.000168] Call Trace:
| [ 142.000185] [<c11b8f7a>] ? dump_stack+0xa/0x20
| [ 142.000197] [<c1037247>] ? __warn+0xe7/0x100
| [ 142.000269] [<f8d3ff2f>] ? i915_gem_free_object+0x25f/0x270 [i915]
| [ 142.000337] [<f8d3ff2f>] ? i915_gem_free_object+0x25f/0x270 [i915]
| [ 142.000347] [<c1037309>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x39/0x40
| [ 142.000416] [<f8d3ff2f>] ? i915_gem_free_object+0x25f/0x270 [i915]
| [ 142.000452] [<f892ed83>] ? drm_gem_object_free+0x23/0x40 [drm]
| [ 142.000478] [<f892f58f>] ? drm_gem_object_handle_unreference_unlocked+0xcf/0xe0 [drm]
| [ 142.000504] [<f892f5e7>] ? drm_gem_object_release_handle+0x47/0x90 [drm]
| [ 142.000529] [<f892f67e>] ? drm_gem_handle_delete+0x4e/0x80 [drm]
| [ 142.000554] [<f892f8d0>] ? drm_gem_handle_create+0x30/0x30 [drm]
| [ 142.000580] [<f89302c0>] ? drm_ioctl+0x230/0x570 [drm]
| [ 142.000606] [<f892f8d0>] ? drm_gem_handle_create+0x30/0x30 [drm]
| [ 142.000618] [<c10b34a3>] ? unmap_page_range+0x433/0x530
| [ 142.000627] [<c11be1c3>] ? __rb_erase_color+0xf3/0x250
| [ 142.000637] [<c10b7116>] ? unlink_file_vma+0x36/0x70
| [ 142.000645] [<c10b1db9>] ? tlb_finish_mmu+0x9/0x30
| [ 142.000671] [<f8930090>] ? drm_ioctl_permit+0x80/0x80 [drm]
| [ 142.000682] [<c10e7250>] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0x80/0x6a0
| [ 142.000690] [<c11bf570>] ? timerqueue_del+0x20/0x70
| [ 142.000699] [<c10cbde5>] ? kmem_cache_free+0x95/0xa0
| [ 142.000708] [<c10b6d0e>] ? remove_vma+0x3e/0x50
| [ 142.000717] [<c10b9019>] ? do_munmap+0x219/0x2d0
| [ 142.000726] [<c10e78b3>] ? SyS_ioctl+0x43/0x80
| [ 142.000735] [<c1001272>] ? do_fast_syscall_32+0x82/0x110
| [ 142.000745] [<c134644f>] ? sysenter_past_esp+0x40/0x6a
| [ 142.000777] ---[ end trace c0ddddf77cdb5434 ]---
Each time an Xv window disappears from view--sometimes with slight
variations in the stacktrace. Do you need full debug info or a bunch more
stacktraces or is this enough to get an idea?
> > Also, I have occasional X server crashes (every few weeks or so) which
> > started with 4.1.9, I think (I had 3.11.0 before that), and I had some kind
> > of problem with Xv not working anymore until reboot with 4.1.9 which hasn't
> > happened with 4.4.5 yet ... do you think any of those would be worth
> > further investigation? If so, any suggestions as to how to split it all
> > into separate issues/how to go about it?
>
> No idea about X stuff, not my expertise ;-)
Well, I would guess that something that persists until reboot smells like a
kernel/driver bug? Also, IIRC, there was no (major) X server upgrade
between 3.11.0 and 4.1.9, so chances are that's a kernel/driver bug as well
;-)
Regards, Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-30 23:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-26 11:21 blank screen on boot with i915/DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION Florian Zumbiehl
2016-03-29 12:01 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-03-29 16:44 ` Florian Zumbiehl
2016-03-30 6:29 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2016-03-30 23:14 ` Florian Zumbiehl [this message]
2016-04-12 1:23 ` i951 ERRORs and WARN_ON()s (was: blank screen on boot with i915/DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION) Florian Zumbiehl
2016-04-27 10:03 ` [Intel-gfx] " Marius Vlad
2016-04-27 12:40 ` Florian Zumbiehl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160330231430.GC6652@florz.florz.de \
--to=florz@florz.de \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®