From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: oss@buserror.net, Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] eBPF JIT for PPC64
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 15:54:22 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160401102422.GE17907@naverao1-tp.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1459504222.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 2016/04/01 03:28PM, Naveen N Rao wrote:
> Implement extended BPF JIT for ppc64. We retain the classic BPF JIT for
> ppc32 and move ppc64 BE/LE to use the new JIT. Classic BPF filters will
> be converted to extended BPF (see convert_filter()) and JIT'ed with the
> new compiler.
>
> Most of the existing macros are retained and fixed/enhanced where
> appropriate. Patches 1-4 are geared towards this.
>
> Patch 5 breaks out the classic BPF JIT specifics into a separate
> bpf_jit32.h header file, while retaining all the generic instruction
> macros in bpf_jit.h. Most of these macros can potentially be generalized
> and moved to more common code (tagged with a TODO in patch 6).
>
> Patch 6 implements eBPF JIT for ppc64.
As a comparison, here are the test results with the BPF test suite
kernel module:
With the classic BPF JIT:
test_bpf: Summary: 291 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [85/283 JIT'ed]
and with the extended BPF JIT:
test_bpf: Summary: 291 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [234/283 JIT'ed]
As noted in patch 6, there are still a few more instructions to be
JIT'ed.
- Naveen
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-01 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-01 9:58 Naveen N. Rao
2016-04-01 9:58 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] ppc: bpf/jit: Fix/enhance 32-bit Load Immediate implementation Naveen N. Rao
2016-04-01 9:58 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] ppc: bpf/jit: Optimize 64-bit Immediate loads Naveen N. Rao
2016-04-01 9:58 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] ppc: bpf/jit: Introduce rotate immediate instructions Naveen N. Rao
2016-04-01 9:58 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] ppc: bpf/jit: A few cleanups Naveen N. Rao
2016-04-01 9:58 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] ppc: bpf/jit: Isolate classic BPF JIT specifics into a separate header Naveen N. Rao
2016-04-01 9:58 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] ppc: ebpf/jit: Implement JIT compiler for extended BPF Naveen N. Rao
2016-04-01 18:10 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-04-01 18:34 ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-04-04 17:09 ` Naveen N. Rao
2016-04-01 10:24 ` Naveen N. Rao [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160401102422.GE17907@naverao1-tp.ibm.com \
--to=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=ast@fb.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=matt@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=oss@buserror.net \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®