From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Atsushi Kumagai <ats-kumagai@wm.jp.nec.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kexec: update VMCOREINFO for compound_order/dtor
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 13:24:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160401132421.7cadaeb967dc342f643d8c38@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0910DD04CBD6DE4193FCF86B9C00BE9701E25FCE@BPXM01GP.gisp.nec.co.jp>
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 06:14:32 +0000 Atsushi Kumagai <ats-kumagai@wm.jp.nec.com> wrote:
> makedumpfile refers page.lru.next to get the order of compound pages
> for page filtering. However, now the order is stored in page.compound_order,
> hence VMCOREINFO should be updated to export the offset of
> page.compound_order.
>
> The fact is, page.compound_order was introduced already in kernel 4.0,
> but the offset of it was the same as page.lru.next until kernel 4.3,
> so this was not actual problem.
>
> The above can be said also for page.lru.prev and page.compound_dtor,
> it's necessary to detect hugetlbfs pages. Further, the content was
> changed from direct address to the ID which means dtor.
It's unclear which kernels need the patch and why. I *think* that the
patch is needed in 4.3.x, 4.4.x, 4.5.x and 4.6 in order to make
makedumpfile work correctly. Is that right?
And it appears that [patch 2/2] is needed in 4.0+?
However in both cases I am uncertain - what are the end-user visible
effects of these regressions? Why can bugs remain in place for so long
without having been observed?
Please make all these things clear when perparing changelogs for
bugfixes: which kernel versions need fixing and why (ie: what are the
end-user visible effects of the bug).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-01 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-01 6:14 Atsushi Kumagai
2016-04-01 20:24 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2016-04-04 1:04 ` Atsushi Kumagai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160401132421.7cadaeb967dc342f643d8c38@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ats-kumagai@wm.jp.nec.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®