From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1758912AbcDAPKW (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 1 Apr 2016 11:10:22 -0400
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:45227 "EHLO
	bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751410AbcDAPKV (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 1 Apr 2016 11:10:21 -0400
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 17:10:17 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "open list:SCHEDULER" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/clock: Remove pointless test in
 cpu_clock/local_clock
Message-ID: <20160401151017.GK3448@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <1459518409-9448-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1459518409-9448-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 03:46:48PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:

> Remove the duplicate test by directly calling sched_clock_cpu() and let the
> static key act in this function instead. We can assume gcc is smart enough to
> inline cpu_clock()/local_clock() to sched_clock_cpu().

Why assume if you can easily check; so does it indeed inline?