From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751016AbcDEECx (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2016 00:02:53 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:51067 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750711AbcDEECv (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2016 00:02:51 -0400 Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 21:02:40 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Kefeng Wang Cc: Noam Camus , Andy Shevchenko , Heikki Krogerus , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, guohanjun@huawei.com, xuwei5@hisilicon.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] serial: 8250_dw: fix wrong logic in dw8250_check_lcr() Message-ID: <20160405040240.GA24639@kroah.com> References: <1459827166-13861-1-git-send-email-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1459827166-13861-1-git-send-email-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 11:32:46AM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote: > Commit cdcea058e510 ("serial: 8250_dw: Avoid serial_outx code duplicate > with new dw8250_check_lcr()") introduce a wrong logic when write val to > LCR reg. When CONFIG_64BIT enabled, __raw_writeq is used unconditionally. > > The __raw_readq/__raw_writeq is introduced by commit bca2092d7897 ("serial: > 8250_dw: Use 64-bit access for OCTEON.") for OCTEON, so for !PORT_OCTEON, > we better to use coincident write func. > > Fixes: cdcea058e510("serial: 8250_dw: Avoid serial_outx code duplicate with new dw8250_check_lcr()") > Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang > --- > Keep #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT to ensure it built under arch lacking readq/writeq. > > drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c | 7 ++++--- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) What changed between all of these versions? Always document that below the --- line otherwise I think they are all the same and I'll just delete them all :) v4 please. thanks, greg k-h