From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756231AbcDGMvu (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Apr 2016 08:51:50 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f67.google.com ([74.125.82.67]:34787 "EHLO mail-wm0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755740AbcDGMvs (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Apr 2016 08:51:48 -0400 Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 14:51:45 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: David Rientjes Cc: Andrew Morton , Nikolay Borisov , Johannes Weiner , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [patch v2] mm, hugetlb_cgroup: round limit_in_bytes down to hugepage size Message-ID: <20160407125145.GD32755@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <5704BA37.2080508@kyup.com> <5704BBBF.8040302@kyup.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed 06-04-16 15:10:23, David Rientjes wrote: [...] > +static void hugetlb_cgroup_init(struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cgroup, > + struct hugetlb_cgroup *parent_h_cgroup) > +{ > + int idx; > + > + for (idx = 0; idx < HUGE_MAX_HSTATE; idx++) { > + struct page_counter *counter = &h_cgroup->hugepage[idx]; > + struct page_counter *parent = NULL; > + unsigned long limit; > + int ret; > + > + if (parent_h_cgroup) > + parent = &parent_h_cgroup->hugepage[idx]; > + page_counter_init(counter, parent); > + > + limit = round_down(PAGE_COUNTER_MAX, > + 1 << huge_page_order(&hstates[idx])); > + ret = page_counter_limit(counter, limit); > + VM_BUG_ON(ret); > + } > +} I fail to see the point for this. Why would want to round down PAGE_COUNTER_MAX? It will never make a real difference. Or am I missing something? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs