mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: This patch triggers a bad gcc bug (was Re: [PATCH] force inlining of some byteswap operations)
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 22:36:49 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160413033649.7r3msnmo3trtq47z@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454615136-32308-2-git-send-email-dvlasenk@redhat.com>

On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 08:45:35PM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> Sometimes gcc mysteriously doesn't inline
> very small functions we expect to be inlined. See
>     https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66122
> 
> With this .config:
> http://busybox.net/~vda/kernel_config_OPTIMIZE_INLINING_and_Os,
> the following functions get deinlined many times.
> Examples of disassembly:
> 
> <get_unaligned_be16> (12 copies, 51 calls):
>        66 8b 07                mov    (%rdi),%ax
>        55                      push   %rbp
>        48 89 e5                mov    %rsp,%rbp
>        86 e0                   xchg   %ah,%al
>        5d                      pop    %rbp
>        c3                      retq
> 
> <get_unaligned_be32> (12 copies, 135 calls):
>        8b 07                   mov    (%rdi),%eax
>        55                      push   %rbp
>        48 89 e5                mov    %rsp,%rbp
>        0f c8                   bswap  %eax
>        5d                      pop    %rbp
>        c3                      retq
> 
> <get_unaligned_be64> (2 copies, 20 calls):
>        48 8b 07                mov    (%rdi),%rax
>        55                      push   %rbp
>        48 89 e5                mov    %rsp,%rbp
>        48 0f c8                bswap  %rax
>        5d                      pop    %rbp
>        c3                      retq
> 
> <__swab16p> (16 copies, 146 calls):
>        55                      push   %rbp
>        89 f8                   mov    %edi,%eax
>        86 e0                   xchg   %ah,%al
>        48 89 e5                mov    %rsp,%rbp
>        5d                      pop    %rbp
>        c3                      retq
> 
> <__swab32p> (43 copies, ~560 calls):
>        55                      push   %rbp
>        89 f8                   mov    %edi,%eax
>        0f c8                   bswap  %eax
>        48 89 e5                mov    %rsp,%rbp
>        5d                      pop    %rbp
>        c3                      retq
> 
> <__swab64p> (21 copies, 119 calls):
>        55                      push   %rbp
>        48 89 f8                mov    %rdi,%rax
>        48 0f c8                bswap  %rax
>        48 89 e5                mov    %rsp,%rbp
>        5d                      pop    %rbp
>        c3                      retq
> 
> <__swab32s> (6 copies, 47 calls):
>        8b 07                   mov    (%rdi),%eax
>        55                      push   %rbp
>        48 89 e5                mov    %rsp,%rbp
>        0f c8                   bswap  %eax
>        89 07                   mov    %eax,(%rdi)
>        5d                      pop    %rbp
>        c3                      retq
> 
> This patch fixes this via s/inline/__always_inline/.
> Code size decrease after the patch is ~4.5k:
> 
>     text     data      bss       dec     hex filename
> 92202377 20826112 36417536 149446025 8e85d89 vmlinux
> 92197848 20826112 36417536 149441496 8e84bd8 vmlinux5_swap_after
> 
> Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h    | 24 ++++++++++++------------
>  include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h | 24 ++++++++++++------------
>  include/uapi/linux/swab.h                    | 10 +++++-----
>  3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

Hi,

This patch seems to trigger a gcc bug which can produce corrupt code.  I
discovered it when investigating an objtool warning reported by kbuild
bot:

  http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg95481.html

>From the disassembly of drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_attr.o:

0000000000002f53 <qla2x00_get_host_fabric_name>:
    2f53:       55                      push   %rbp
    2f54:       48 89 e5                mov    %rsp,%rbp

0000000000002f57 <qla2x00_get_fc_host_stats>:
    2f57:       55                      push   %rbp
    2f58:       b9 e8 00 00 00          mov    $0xe8,%ecx
    2f5d:       48 89 e5                mov    %rsp,%rbp
...

Note that qla2x00_get_host_fabric_name() is inexplicably truncated after
setting up the frame pointer.  It falls through to the next function, which is
very wrong.

I can recreate it with either gcc 5.3.1 or gcc 6.0 on linus/master with
the .config from the above link.

The call chain which appears to trigger the problem is:

qla2x00_get_host_fabric_name()
  wwn_to_u64()
    get_unaligned_be64()
      be64_to_cpup()
        __be64_to_cpup() <- changed to __always_inline by this patch

It occurs with the combination of the following two recent commits:

- bc27fb68aaad ("include/uapi/linux/byteorder, swab: force inlining of some byteswap operations")
- ef3fb2422ffe ("scsi: fc: use get/put_unaligned64 for wwn access")

I can confirm that reverting either patch makes the problem go away.
I'm planning on opening a gcc bug tomorrow.

> -static inline __u64 __be64_to_cpup(const __be64 *p)
> +static __always_inline __u64 __be64_to_cpup(const __be64 *p)
>  {
>  	return __swab64p((__u64 *)p);
>  }

-- 
Josh

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-13  3:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-04 19:45 [PATCH] asm-generic: force inlining of some atomic_long operations Denys Vlasenko
2016-02-04 19:45 ` [PATCH] force inlining of some byteswap operations Denys Vlasenko
2016-02-05  7:28   ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-13  3:36   ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2016-04-13 12:12     ` This patch triggers a bad gcc bug (was Re: [PATCH] force inlining of some byteswap operations) Denys Vlasenko
2016-04-13 12:36       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-13 15:15         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-13 16:55           ` James Bottomley
2016-04-13 17:10             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-14 15:29               ` Denys Vlasenko
2016-04-14 15:57                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-14 17:09                   ` Denys Vlasenko
2016-04-15  5:45                     ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-15 13:47                       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-15 22:20                         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-16  9:03                           ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-18 13:39                             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-18 14:07                               ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-18 14:12                                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-18 14:21                                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-19  8:52                               ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-19 13:56                                 ` [PATCH] scsi: fc: force inlining of wwn conversion functions Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-22 23:17                                   ` Quinn Tran
2016-04-25 16:07                                   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-26  2:40                                     ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-04-26  3:37                                       ` James Bottomley
2016-04-26  7:22                                         ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26  8:35                                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-26 10:05                                             ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 13:06                                           ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-04-26 15:58                                             ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 22:36                                               ` James Bottomley
2016-04-27  0:44                                                 ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-04-27 11:05                                               ` Martin Jambor
2016-04-27 21:34                                                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-28 14:58                                                   ` Chris Metcalf
2016-04-28 15:23                                                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-28 15:48                                                       ` Chris Metcalf
2016-04-27 22:00                                                 ` [PATCH, RFT] byteswap: try to avoid __builtin_constant_p gcc bug Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-27 22:11                                                   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-28 16:27                                                     ` Quinn Tran
2016-04-16  7:42                       ` This patch triggers a bad gcc bug (was Re: [PATCH] force inlining of some byteswap operations) Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-18 13:22                         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-02-04 19:45 ` [PATCH] force inlining of unaligned byteswap operations Denys Vlasenko
2016-02-05  7:28   ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160413033649.7r3msnmo3trtq47z@treble \
    --to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®