From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: This patch triggers a bad gcc bug (was Re: [PATCH] force inlining of some byteswap operations)
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 22:36:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160413033649.7r3msnmo3trtq47z@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454615136-32308-2-git-send-email-dvlasenk@redhat.com>
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 08:45:35PM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> Sometimes gcc mysteriously doesn't inline
> very small functions we expect to be inlined. See
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66122
>
> With this .config:
> http://busybox.net/~vda/kernel_config_OPTIMIZE_INLINING_and_Os,
> the following functions get deinlined many times.
> Examples of disassembly:
>
> <get_unaligned_be16> (12 copies, 51 calls):
> 66 8b 07 mov (%rdi),%ax
> 55 push %rbp
> 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
> 86 e0 xchg %ah,%al
> 5d pop %rbp
> c3 retq
>
> <get_unaligned_be32> (12 copies, 135 calls):
> 8b 07 mov (%rdi),%eax
> 55 push %rbp
> 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
> 0f c8 bswap %eax
> 5d pop %rbp
> c3 retq
>
> <get_unaligned_be64> (2 copies, 20 calls):
> 48 8b 07 mov (%rdi),%rax
> 55 push %rbp
> 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
> 48 0f c8 bswap %rax
> 5d pop %rbp
> c3 retq
>
> <__swab16p> (16 copies, 146 calls):
> 55 push %rbp
> 89 f8 mov %edi,%eax
> 86 e0 xchg %ah,%al
> 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
> 5d pop %rbp
> c3 retq
>
> <__swab32p> (43 copies, ~560 calls):
> 55 push %rbp
> 89 f8 mov %edi,%eax
> 0f c8 bswap %eax
> 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
> 5d pop %rbp
> c3 retq
>
> <__swab64p> (21 copies, 119 calls):
> 55 push %rbp
> 48 89 f8 mov %rdi,%rax
> 48 0f c8 bswap %rax
> 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
> 5d pop %rbp
> c3 retq
>
> <__swab32s> (6 copies, 47 calls):
> 8b 07 mov (%rdi),%eax
> 55 push %rbp
> 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
> 0f c8 bswap %eax
> 89 07 mov %eax,(%rdi)
> 5d pop %rbp
> c3 retq
>
> This patch fixes this via s/inline/__always_inline/.
> Code size decrease after the patch is ~4.5k:
>
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 92202377 20826112 36417536 149446025 8e85d89 vmlinux
> 92197848 20826112 36417536 149441496 8e84bd8 vmlinux5_swap_after
>
> Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> include/uapi/linux/swab.h | 10 +++++-----
> 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
Hi,
This patch seems to trigger a gcc bug which can produce corrupt code. I
discovered it when investigating an objtool warning reported by kbuild
bot:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg95481.html
>From the disassembly of drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_attr.o:
0000000000002f53 <qla2x00_get_host_fabric_name>:
2f53: 55 push %rbp
2f54: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
0000000000002f57 <qla2x00_get_fc_host_stats>:
2f57: 55 push %rbp
2f58: b9 e8 00 00 00 mov $0xe8,%ecx
2f5d: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
...
Note that qla2x00_get_host_fabric_name() is inexplicably truncated after
setting up the frame pointer. It falls through to the next function, which is
very wrong.
I can recreate it with either gcc 5.3.1 or gcc 6.0 on linus/master with
the .config from the above link.
The call chain which appears to trigger the problem is:
qla2x00_get_host_fabric_name()
wwn_to_u64()
get_unaligned_be64()
be64_to_cpup()
__be64_to_cpup() <- changed to __always_inline by this patch
It occurs with the combination of the following two recent commits:
- bc27fb68aaad ("include/uapi/linux/byteorder, swab: force inlining of some byteswap operations")
- ef3fb2422ffe ("scsi: fc: use get/put_unaligned64 for wwn access")
I can confirm that reverting either patch makes the problem go away.
I'm planning on opening a gcc bug tomorrow.
> -static inline __u64 __be64_to_cpup(const __be64 *p)
> +static __always_inline __u64 __be64_to_cpup(const __be64 *p)
> {
> return __swab64p((__u64 *)p);
> }
--
Josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-13 3:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-04 19:45 [PATCH] asm-generic: force inlining of some atomic_long operations Denys Vlasenko
2016-02-04 19:45 ` [PATCH] force inlining of some byteswap operations Denys Vlasenko
2016-02-05 7:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-13 3:36 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2016-04-13 12:12 ` This patch triggers a bad gcc bug (was Re: [PATCH] force inlining of some byteswap operations) Denys Vlasenko
2016-04-13 12:36 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-13 15:15 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-13 16:55 ` James Bottomley
2016-04-13 17:10 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-14 15:29 ` Denys Vlasenko
2016-04-14 15:57 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-14 17:09 ` Denys Vlasenko
2016-04-15 5:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-15 13:47 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-15 22:20 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-16 9:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-18 13:39 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-18 14:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-18 14:12 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-18 14:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-19 8:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-19 13:56 ` [PATCH] scsi: fc: force inlining of wwn conversion functions Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-22 23:17 ` Quinn Tran
2016-04-25 16:07 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-26 2:40 ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-04-26 3:37 ` James Bottomley
2016-04-26 7:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 8:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-26 10:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 13:06 ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-04-26 15:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 22:36 ` James Bottomley
2016-04-27 0:44 ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-04-27 11:05 ` Martin Jambor
2016-04-27 21:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-28 14:58 ` Chris Metcalf
2016-04-28 15:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-28 15:48 ` Chris Metcalf
2016-04-27 22:00 ` [PATCH, RFT] byteswap: try to avoid __builtin_constant_p gcc bug Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-27 22:11 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-28 16:27 ` Quinn Tran
2016-04-16 7:42 ` This patch triggers a bad gcc bug (was Re: [PATCH] force inlining of some byteswap operations) Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-18 13:22 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-02-04 19:45 ` [PATCH] force inlining of unaligned byteswap operations Denys Vlasenko
2016-02-05 7:28 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160413033649.7r3msnmo3trtq47z@treble \
--to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®