From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752007AbcDOVo6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Apr 2016 17:44:58 -0400 Received: from tex.lwn.net ([70.33.254.29]:38506 "EHLO vena.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751747AbcDOVo4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Apr 2016 17:44:56 -0400 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 15:44:54 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Andi Shyti Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Michael Turquette , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Shyti Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: clk: update file names containing referenced structures Message-ID: <20160415154454.0564b1a0@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <1459997333-29884-1-git-send-email-andi.shyti@samsung.com> References: <1459997333-29884-1-git-send-email-andi.shyti@samsung.com> Organization: LWN.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 11:48:53 +0900 Andi Shyti wrote: > Commit 'b09d6d991' removes include/linux/clk-private.h and > re-arranges the clock related structures contained in it in > different files. The documentation has not been updated > accordingly, thus it wasn't anymore consistent. > > Place the structures referenced by Documentation/clk.txt in the > correct files and update their contents to the latest status. [...] > Below is the common struct clk definition from > -include/linux/clk-private.h, modified for brevity: > - > - struct clk { > - const char *name; > - const struct clk_ops *ops; > - struct clk_hw *hw; > - char **parent_names; > - struct clk **parents; > - struct clk *parent; > - struct hlist_head children; > - struct hlist_node child_node; > +include/linux/clk.c, modified for brevity: > + Um...include/linux/clk.c? We have 19 files named clk.c, but none of them (unsurprisingly) are under include/ . The patch also seems to have a bunch of gratuitous white-space changes? jon