From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kbuild fix branch for linux-next
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 08:57:22 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160426085722.35a6a826@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1604251203100.5091@knanqh.ubzr>
Hi Nicolas,
On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 12:20:56 -0400 (EDT) Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Could you please add the following branch to the linux-next tree:
>
> git://git.linaro.org/people/nicolas.pitre/linux kbuild
>
> It includes 3 patches on top of Michal's kbuild branch already in your
> tree. Those patches fix issues that have been reported by 3 people
> already, and I'd like those fixes to appear in linux-next until Michal
> picks them up, which should happen in, well, some "undefined" amount of
> time. ;-)
Thanks for adding your subsystem tree as a participant of linux-next. As
you may know, this is not a judgement of your code. The purpose of
linux-next is for integration testing and to lower the impact of
conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window.
You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have
been:
* submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's
Signed-off-by,
* posted to the relevant mailing list,
* reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree),
* successfully unit tested, and
* destined for the current or next Linux merge window.
Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him
to fetch). It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
sfr@canb.auug.org.au
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-25 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-25 16:20 Nicolas Pitre
2016-04-25 22:57 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2016-04-26 14:50 ` Nicolas Pitre
2016-04-26 15:19 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160426085722.35a6a826@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.com \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®