mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "George Spelvin" <linux@horizon.com>
To: linux@horizon.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [patch 2/7] lib/hashmod: Add modulo based hash mechanism
Date: 29 Apr 2016 23:04:31 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160430030431.20266.qmail@ns.horizon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFzcKdp3o=JTS=jESD4sXK2Ee+Z_=aG1vGf4Y0EvZQSbVw@mail.gmail.com>

> Not doing it for 64-bit constants makes no sense if it just uses the
> trivial Booth's algorithm version.

AFAICT, gcc 5 *does* optimize 64-bit multiplies by constants.
Does the belief that it doesn't date back to some really old
version?

There's still a threshold where it just punts to the multiplier.

Some examples, x86-64 (gcc 6.0.1) and aarch64 (gcc 5.3.1).
Note the difference in the multiply-by-12345 routine.

	return x*9;
mul9:
        leaq    (%rdi,%rdi,8), %rax
        ret
mul9:
        add     x0, x0, x0, lsl 3
        ret

	return x*10;
mul10:
        leaq    (%rdi,%rdi,4), %rax
        addq    %rax, %rax
        ret
mul10:
        lsl     x1, x0, 3
        add     x0, x1, x0, lsl 1
        ret

	return x*127;
mul127:
        movq    %rdi, %rax
        salq    $7, %rax
        subq    %rdi, %rax
        ret
mul127:
        lsl     x1, x0, 7
        sub     x0, x1, x0
        ret

	return x*12345;
mul12345:
        imulq   $12345, %rdi, %rax
        ret
mul12345:
        lsl     x1, x0, 3
        sub     x1, x1, x0
        lsl     x1, x1, 1
        sub     x1, x1, x0
        lsl     x1, x1, 3
        sub     x1, x1, x0
        lsl     x1, x1, 3
        sub     x0, x1, x0
        lsl     x1, x0, 4
        sub     x0, x1, x0
        ret

        uint64_t y = (x << 9) - (x << 3) + x;
        return x + (x << 14) - (y << 3);
mul12345_manual:
        movq    %rdi, %rdx
        salq    $14, %rax
        salq    $9, %rdx
        addq    %rdi, %rax
        addq    %rdi, %rdx
        salq    $3, %rdi
        subq    %rdi, %rdx
        salq    $3, %rdx
        subq    %rdx, %rax
        ret
mul12345_manual:
        lsl     x2, x0, 9
        lsl     x1, x0, 14
        add     x2, x2, x0
        add     x1, x1, x0
        sub     x0, x2, x0, lsl 3
        sub     x0, x1, x0, lsl 3
        ret

	return x*2654435769:
mul2654435769:
        movl    $2654435769, %eax
        imulq   %rdi, %rax
        ret
mul2654435769:
        mov     x1, 31161
        movk    x1, 0x9e37, lsl 16
        mul     x0, x0, x1
        ret

The problem with variant code paths like mul12345_manual is that the
infrastructure required to determine which to use is many times larger
than the code itself.  :-(

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-30  3:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-29  2:57 George Spelvin
2016-04-29  3:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-04-29  4:12   ` George Spelvin
2016-04-29 23:31   ` George Spelvin
2016-04-30  0:05     ` Linus Torvalds
2016-04-30  0:32       ` George Spelvin
2016-04-30  1:12         ` Linus Torvalds
2016-04-30  3:04           ` George Spelvin [this message]
     [not found] <CA+55aFxBWfAHQNAdBbdVr+z8ror4GVteyce3D3=vwDWxhu5KqQ@mail.gmail.com>
2016-04-30 20:52 ` George Spelvin
2016-05-01  8:35   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-05-01  9:43     ` George Spelvin
2016-05-01 16:51       ` Linus Torvalds
2016-05-14  3:54         ` George Spelvin
2016-05-14 18:35           ` Linus Torvalds
2016-05-02  7:11       ` Thomas Gleixner
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-04-28 16:42 [patch 0/7] futex: Add support for process private hashing Thomas Gleixner
2016-04-28 16:42 ` [patch 2/7] lib/hashmod: Add modulo based hash mechanism Thomas Gleixner
2016-04-28 18:32   ` Linus Torvalds
2016-04-28 23:26     ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-04-29  2:25       ` Linus Torvalds
2016-04-30 13:02         ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-04-30 16:45           ` Eric Dumazet
2016-04-30 17:12             ` Linus Torvalds
2016-04-30 17:37               ` Eric Dumazet
2016-06-12 12:18         ` Sandy Harris
2016-04-29 21:10     ` Linus Torvalds
2016-04-29 23:51       ` Linus Torvalds
2016-04-30  1:34         ` Rik van Riel
2016-05-02  9:39         ` Torvald Riegel
2016-04-30 15:22       ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160430030431.20266.qmail@ns.horizon.com \
    --to=linux@horizon.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®