From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
To: Michael Thalmeier <michael.thalmeier@hale.at>
Cc: Lauro Ramos Venancio <lauro.venancio@openbossa.org>,
Aloisio Almeida Jr <aloisio.almeida@openbossa.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfc@ml01.01.org,
michael@thalmeier.at
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] NFC: pn533: use nfc_alloc_recv_skb for skb allocation
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 01:17:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160501231736.GC19653@zurbaran.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461249839-16962-10-git-send-email-michael.thalmeier@hale.at>
Hi Michael,
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 04:43:57PM +0200, Michael Thalmeier wrote:
> When multiple receive frames need to be put together in pn533_build_response
> we need to use nfc_alloc_recv_skb instead of the normal alloc_skb. Otherwise
> the nfc core causes an skb error when it tries to push the status byte in
> front of the data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Thalmeier <michael.thalmeier@hale.at>
> ---
> drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c b/drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c
> index c06d22f..ae13277 100644
> --- a/drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c
> +++ b/drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c
> @@ -1942,7 +1942,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *pn533_build_response(struct pn533 *dev)
> dev_dbg(dev->dev, "%s total length %d\n",
> __func__, skb_len);
>
> - skb = alloc_skb(skb_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> + skb = nfc_alloc_recv_skb(skb_len, GFP_KERNEL);
That looks reasonable. What surprises me is that I'm pretty sure this
got tested (MI bit set on the Rx path)...
Do you get the error from rawsock_add_header() ?
Cheers,
Samuel.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-01 23:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-21 14:43 [PATCH 00/11] NFC: pn533: bug fixes and improvements Michael Thalmeier
2016-04-21 14:43 ` [PATCH 01/11] NFC: pn533: i2c: free irq on driver remove Michael Thalmeier
2016-04-21 14:43 ` [PATCH 02/11] NFC: pn533: fix order of initialization Michael Thalmeier
2016-04-21 14:43 ` [PATCH 03/11] NFC: pn533: i2c: do not call pn533_recv_frame with aborted commands Michael Thalmeier
2016-04-21 14:43 ` [PATCH 04/11] NFC: pn533: reset poll modulation list before calling nfc_targets_found Michael Thalmeier
2016-04-21 14:43 ` [PATCH 05/11] NFC: pn533: handle interrupted commands in pn533_recv_frame Michael Thalmeier
2016-04-21 14:43 ` [PATCH 06/11] NFC: pn533: usb: fix errors when poll is stopped Michael Thalmeier
2016-05-01 23:17 ` Samuel Ortiz
2016-04-21 14:43 ` [PATCH 07/11] NFC: pn533: improve cmd queue handling Michael Thalmeier
2016-05-01 23:17 ` Samuel Ortiz
2016-04-21 14:43 ` [PATCH 08/11] NFC: pn533: reduce output when stopping poll Michael Thalmeier
2016-05-01 23:18 ` Samuel Ortiz
2016-04-21 14:43 ` [PATCH 09/11] NFC: pn533: use nfc_alloc_recv_skb for skb allocation Michael Thalmeier
2016-05-01 23:17 ` Samuel Ortiz [this message]
2016-04-21 14:43 ` [PATCH 10/11] NFC: pn533: set cmd status when not set Michael Thalmeier
2016-04-21 14:43 ` [PATCH 11/11] nfc: pn533: increase clock frequency for PN532 Michael Thalmeier
2016-04-28 18:18 ` [PATCH 00/11] NFC: pn533: bug fixes and improvements Olliver Schinagl
2016-05-04 15:18 ` Olliver Schinagl
2016-05-09 11:59 ` Olliver Schinagl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160501231736.GC19653@zurbaran.home \
--to=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=aloisio.almeida@openbossa.org \
--cc=lauro.venancio@openbossa.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfc@ml01.01.org \
--cc=michael.thalmeier@hale.at \
--cc=michael@thalmeier.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®