From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754098AbcEBPBV (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2016 11:01:21 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48]:37313 "EHLO mail-wm0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753007AbcEBPBN (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2016 11:01:13 -0400 Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 18:01:10 +0300 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Dave Hansen , "Odzioba, Lukasz" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "Shutemov, Kirill" , "Anaczkowski, Lukasz" Subject: Re: mm: pages are not freed from lru_add_pvecs after process termination Message-ID: <20160502150109.GB24419@node.shutemov.name> References: <5720F2A8.6070406@intel.com> <572766A7.9090406@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <572766A7.9090406@suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 04:39:35PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 04/27/2016 07:11 PM, Dave Hansen wrote: > >6. Perhaps don't use the LRU pagevecs for large pages. It limits the > > severity of the problem. > > I think that makes sense. Being large already amortizes the cost per base > page much more than pagevecs do (512 vs ~22 pages?). We try to do this already, don't we? Any spefic case where we have THPs on pagevecs? -- Kirill A. Shutemov