From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755860AbcECKgu (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 May 2016 06:36:50 -0400 Received: from pandora.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:38416 "EHLO pandora.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755495AbcECKgt (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 May 2016 06:36:49 -0400 Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 11:36:40 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Michael Turquette , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/13] clkdev: Add clk_hw based registration APIs Message-ID: <20160503103640.GO19428@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1461277324-27185-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <1461277324-27185-5-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <20160503003716.GH3492@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160503003716.GH3492@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 05:37:16PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 04/21, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Now that we have a clk registration API that doesn't return > > struct clks, we need to have some way to hand out struct clks via > > the clk_get() APIs that doesn't involve associating struct clk > > pointers with a struct clk_lookup. Luckily, clkdev already > > operates on struct clk_hw pointers, except for the registration > > facing APIs where it converts struct clk pointers into struct > > clk_hw pointers almost immediately. > > > > Let's add clk_hw based registration APIs so that we can skip the > > conversion step and provide a way for clk provider drivers to > > operate exclusively on clk_hw structs. This way we clearly > > split the API between consumers and providers. > > > > Cc: Russell King > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd > > --- > > Applied to clk-next It would have been nice if you could wait a little longer. As I've just explained in another email, I've been away last weekend from Thursday 21st through until Tuesday 26th. I then spent Wednesday and Thursday catching up with the resulting backlog of email, and last weekend (30th through to the 2nd May) was a bank holiday weekend in the UK. So there's only been _one_ day that I could have looked at your patches, but unfortunately the little matter of doing stuff for paying customers got in the way. A little more patience would have been nice. I'll try to look at them this evening. Thanks. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.